Silent subtype 3 pituitary adenoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of the Mayo Clinic experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Macroadenomas represent 50% of pituitary tumours and are often (30%) nonfunctioning. Their immunophenotype suggests differentiation toward a specific pituitary cell line. A substantial proportion of tumours with particularly aggressive behaviour are so called 'silent subtype 3 adenoma'. Its diagnosis requires ultrastructural confirmation. Although once included among silent corticotroph adenomas, this aggressive, morphologically distinctive tumour is now recognized as a major form of plurihormonal adenoma and, in fact, some patients might present with clinical hormonal excess. The cytogenesis and pathobiology of silent subtype 3 adenomas is unsettled. OBJECTIVE: We undertook a systematic clinicopathologic examination of the Mayo Clinic experience with this poorly understood tumour. DESIGN: This retrospective, single institution study found 27 confirmed examples of silent subtype 3 adenoma, a frequency of 0.9% of adenomas. Despite histologic and immunophenotypic variation, their ultrastructural features were diagnostic and the sole basis for case inclusion. RESULTS: The study group was comprised of 16 men (59%) and 11 women (41%); two patients (7%) had definitive diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Three tumours (11%) were discovered incidentally. Nine patients each (38%) presented with headaches or visual field loss. Endocrine hyperfunction was noted in eight cases (30%), including GH excess in five (19%) and clinically significant PRL elevation in three (11%). Hypogonadism was noted in 17 cases (63%) and growth arrest in one (4%). All tumours were macroadenomas; 16 (60%) showed radiographic evidence of invasion. Most tumours were plurihormonal, featuring immunoreactivity for PRL (17), GH (15), TSH (16) or ACTH (3); only one lesion was immunonegative. Although a gross total resection was achieved in 19 cases (70%), re-operation for recurrence(s) was required in seven of these (37%). Follow-up (mean, 69 months) showed a high (59%) rate of persistent or recurrent of tumour. Overall, 14 patients (54%) underwent radiotherapy after surgical treatment: three patients (12%) for substantial residual tumour, eight (31%) as adjuvant therapy and three (12%) for tumour regrowth. CONCLUSION: Silent subtype 3 adenoma, a plurihormonal tumour, is rare and aggressive in nature. This adenoma must be considered in the differential of often clinically nonfunctioning but plurihormonal adenomas featuring variable cytologic atypia. Electron microscopy is required for confirmation of the diagnosis. The cytogenesis of silent subtype 3 adenoma remains unsettled.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".