MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2124206076 · doi:10.1542/pir.23-9-330

Aspiration in Infants and Children

2002· article· en· W2124206076 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pazhanivel Mohan

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatrics in Review · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTracheal and airway disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePediatricsMedical emergency

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Safe swallowing of solid foods and liquids is the result of a complex interaction of cranial nerves and muscles of the oral cavity, pharynx, and proximal esophagus. During the voluntary oral phase, the food bolus is altered in the mouth and propelled past the pharynx where the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts meet; precise coordinating mechanisms are crucial to prevent aspiration into the respiratory passage. Normal mechanisms of safe swallow include raising of the palate, epiglottic tilt, cord closure, primary peristalsis of the esophagus, and the tone and sequential relaxation of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters. Disorders affecting the central and peripheral nervous system and muscles of the previously noted structures, therefore, can affect swallowing mechanisms and lead to potentially dangerous sequelae.Aspiration may be defined as the accidental entry of a foreign substance into the respiratory tract. The consequences may be devastating, chronic, or subtle, ranging from sudden death to hoarseness. The aspirated material may be solid or liquid components of food, foreign bodies (eg, seeds or toys), or even saliva. Aspiration of large amounts of acidic gastric content (macroaspiration) can lead to mechanical obstruction or chemical pneumonitis, resulting in severe hypoxia. Microaspirations may stimulate upper airway neuronal elements that, in turn, may cause reflex brochospasm or laryngospasm.Aspiration may occur during a swallow or during episodes of gastroesophageal reflux (GER), which should be differentiated from each another because the diagnostic methods and management differ. GER occurs commonly in infancy. Aspiration during reflux episodes is a serious manifestation of GER, particularly in the preterm infant. However, preterm infants also are at risk of aspiration during swallowing because they exhibit poor integration and lack of coordination between swallowing and breathing. Among older infants and children, swallowing disorders are seen mostly as part of a generalized developmental or neurologic abnormality. They include cerebral palsy and mental motor delay from a variety of causes, such as hypoxic brain damage, intraventricular bleeding, central nervous system infections, trauma, or progressive neurologic diseases. The differential diagnosis should include neuromuscular diseases such as muscular dystrophy, Guillian-Barré syndrome, oropharyngeal abnormalities such as cleft palate, Pierre Robin syndrome, and laryngeal anomalies such as vocal cord paralysis from brainstem lesions or surgical trauma. Rarely, isolated cricopharyngeal dysfunction or achalasia may manifest as feeding difficulties and aspiration.Overt aspiration presents with signs and symptoms that can include gagging, choking, cyanosis, or apnea. Episodes of apnea and bradycardia are ominous signs of aspiration in preterm infants. Recurrent respiratory infections, wheezing not responding to conventional therapy, chronic cough with feeding, poor feeding, malnutrition, and excessive drooling may be subtle features of silent aspiration that often are seen in children who have neurologic impairments. The typical symptoms of vocal cord paralysis include stridor, ineffective cough, feeding difficulties, and an abnormal or weak cry. Occasionally, aspiration may be witnessed in an asymptomatic patient during a routine barium swallow.A detailed history, a complete physical examination, and a trial feeding are the basic requirements for diagnosing aspiration. A barium swallow to define the upper gastrointestinal anatomy and a radionuclear scan (“milk scan”) to quantify reflux episodes are the primary tools for diagnosing GER. A more extensive 24-hour pH study helps to establish the presence of silent GER associated with episodes of apnea or respiratory distress. The most appropriate test for diagnosing aspiration during swallowing is a modified barium swallow (MBS) or videofluoroscopy. By using different textures of foods and liquids, this study can differentiate various abnormalities of the oropharyngeal phase of swallowing.Management of aspiration includes treatment of the causative factors. The management of GER consists of positioning, thickening of feedings, and pharmacologic agents. By virtue of the nature of the causative factors, the management of swallowing dysfunction is more complex and includes alteration of food bolus, adjustment of head and neck, jaw stabilization, minimization of oral hypersensitivity, and swallowing exercises, often supervised by an occupational therapist or a speech pathologist. If aspiration is significant enough to preclude safe oral feeding, nasogastric or gastrostomy feeding may be necessary.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePediatrics in Review→Même sujetTracheal and airway disorders→Travaux en français237 207→