MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2125719967 · doi:10.1097/00000542-200105000-00035

Bronchospasm after Rapacuronium in Infants and Children

2001· article· en· W2125719967 sur OpenAlexaff
G. MEAKIN, Erik H. Pronske, Jerrold Lerman, Rosemary J. Orr, Denise Joffe, Anne M. Savaree, Anne M Lynn

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnesthesiology · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAirway Management and Intubation Techniques
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAnesthesiaBronchospasmFentanylPropofolVomitingMidazolamPulse oximetrySurgeryAsthmaSedation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

THE use of rapacuronium has been associated with occasional episodes of self-limited increased airway pressure with or without mild oxygen (O 2 ) desaturation and wheezing.To our knowledge, this is the first report of severe bronchospasm associated with a transient inability to ventilate and marked O 2 desaturation after its administration. Case ReportThe patient was a 10-yr-old girl who was brought to the operating room to undergo appendectomy.Except for 1 week of abdominal pain and mild nausea but no vomiting, her history was negative.There were no previous anesthetics, environmental or drug allergies, recent upper respiratory infection, or reactive airway disease.No one in her household smoked.She weighed 62 kg and was 138 cm tall.Except for findings related to her surgical problem, her physical examination was unremarkable, and her chest was clear.While the patient was preoxygenated for 3 min using a 6-l/min flow of O 2 , the usual monitors were applied.Then, 1 mg midazolam and 50 g fentanyl were administered intravenously.After an additional 2 min of oxygen administration, a rapid sequence induction was performed with 150 mg propofol, immediately followed by 100 mg intravenous rapacuronium (approximately 1.6 mg/kg).After 30 s, O 2 saturation was noted to decrease from 100% to approximately 95%.We elected to administer ventilation by mask for an additional 45 s with 100% O 2 while applying cricoid pressure.Her chest rose, but O 2 saturation improved only slightly to 96%.A cuffed No. 6.5 endotracheal tube was placed in her trachea with apparent ease, followed by an immediate attempt at manual ventilation.Despite ventilating pressures of up to 30 cm H 2 O, breath sounds, chest movement, endotracheal tube fogging, end-tidal carbon dioxide, or gastric sounds could not be detected.The anesthesia circuit was rechecked quickly and was observed to be patent.While maintaining cricoid pressure, the endotracheal tube was removed and noted to be unobstructed, and an attempt was made at bag and mask ventilation.Unlike with the preintubation mask ventilation, this time, there were no chest movements, breath sounds, or end-tidal carbon dioxide.The patient was reintubated easily, but ventilation remained impossible.Approximately 2 min had elapsed since her initial intubation.At this point, she also was noted to have truncal erythema and an O 2 saturation of 70%.She was given four doses of 100 g albuterol aerosol via the endotracheal tube, and ventilation was attempted again with 8% sevoflurane in O 2 .During the next minute, it became possible to ventilate with small tidal volumes and ventilating pressures between 20 and 30 cm H 2 O. O 2 saturations began to increase, and wheezing breath sounds could now be heard.A treatment of 2.5 mg nebulized albuterol was administered via the endotracheal tube, and 50 mg benadryl was administered intravenously.During the ensuing 5 min, manual ventilation became progressively easier with tidal volumes increasing to 350 -450 ml at pressures of 15-20 cm H 2 O.The patient's O 2 saturation increased to 100%, breath sounds returned to normal, and the erythema dissipated.During this event, her blood pressure had ranged between 90/60 and 110/50 mmHg, and her pulse had ranged between 90 and 115 beats/min.Anesthesia was continued with 2-4% sevoflurane, 2 l/min O 2 , and 2 l/min N 2 O. Rocuronium, 10 mg, was required to assist with relaxation.Surgery proceeded uneventfully with the removal of an inflamed retrocecal appendix.Muscle relaxation was reversed with 1 mg neostigmine and 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate.With the patient spontaneously breathing, volumes of 250 -400 ml at a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min, and an equal train-of-four, nitrous oxide was discontinued.We elected to extubate the patient deeply, so after 5 min of 4% sevoflurane in O 2 , the stomach and oropharynx were thoroughly suctioned, and the endotracheal tube was removed.She continued to breathe 100% O 2 spontaneously, awoke, and was transferred to the postanesthesia care unit, where her O 2 saturation with room air was 99 -100% and her chest was clear.Chest radiography results were negative.She was transferred to the pediatric unit and was discharged on the second postoperative day. DiscussionThis patient had no factors predisposing her to a reactive airway.Of the anesthetics used for induction, midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol usually are not associated with bronchospasm.Increased airway pressure with or without wheezing and O 2 desaturation has been reported in clinical studies of rapacuronium.The manufacturer's package insert reports an incidence of 3.2%, with no data about the severity.Kahwaji et al. 1 reported bronchospasm and erythema that developed in an American Society of Anesthesiologists class I patient 30 s after 2 mg/kg rapacuronium and gradually subsided after salbutamol.Mild wheezing developed in a second patient after a dose of 1 mg/kg.These authors suggest that histamine release is responsible.Fleming et al. 2 studied 336 patients; half were intubated with 1 mg/kg succinylcholine, and half were intubated with 1.5 mg/kg rapacuronium.Bronchospasm, defined as wheezing, occurred in five of the rapacuronium patients, as opposed to only two of the succinylcholine patients.All but one of these patients had factors predisposing to broncho-This article is accompanied by an Editorial View.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations48
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnesthesiologyMême sujetAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesTravaux en français237 207