MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bronchospasm after Rapacuronium in Infants and Children

2001· article· en· W2125719967 on OpenAlexaff
G. MEAKIN, Erik H. Pronske, Jerrold Lerman, Rosemary J. Orr, Denise Joffe, Anne M. Savaree, Anne M Lynn

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAirway Management and Intubation Techniques
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaBronchospasmFentanylPropofolVomitingMidazolamPulse oximetrySurgeryAsthmaSedation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE use of rapacuronium has been associated with occasional episodes of self-limited increased airway pressure with or without mild oxygen (O 2 ) desaturation and wheezing.To our knowledge, this is the first report of severe bronchospasm associated with a transient inability to ventilate and marked O 2 desaturation after its administration. Case ReportThe patient was a 10-yr-old girl who was brought to the operating room to undergo appendectomy.Except for 1 week of abdominal pain and mild nausea but no vomiting, her history was negative.There were no previous anesthetics, environmental or drug allergies, recent upper respiratory infection, or reactive airway disease.No one in her household smoked.She weighed 62 kg and was 138 cm tall.Except for findings related to her surgical problem, her physical examination was unremarkable, and her chest was clear.While the patient was preoxygenated for 3 min using a 6-l/min flow of O 2 , the usual monitors were applied.Then, 1 mg midazolam and 50 g fentanyl were administered intravenously.After an additional 2 min of oxygen administration, a rapid sequence induction was performed with 150 mg propofol, immediately followed by 100 mg intravenous rapacuronium (approximately 1.6 mg/kg).After 30 s, O 2 saturation was noted to decrease from 100% to approximately 95%.We elected to administer ventilation by mask for an additional 45 s with 100% O 2 while applying cricoid pressure.Her chest rose, but O 2 saturation improved only slightly to 96%.A cuffed No. 6.5 endotracheal tube was placed in her trachea with apparent ease, followed by an immediate attempt at manual ventilation.Despite ventilating pressures of up to 30 cm H 2 O, breath sounds, chest movement, endotracheal tube fogging, end-tidal carbon dioxide, or gastric sounds could not be detected.The anesthesia circuit was rechecked quickly and was observed to be patent.While maintaining cricoid pressure, the endotracheal tube was removed and noted to be unobstructed, and an attempt was made at bag and mask ventilation.Unlike with the preintubation mask ventilation, this time, there were no chest movements, breath sounds, or end-tidal carbon dioxide.The patient was reintubated easily, but ventilation remained impossible.Approximately 2 min had elapsed since her initial intubation.At this point, she also was noted to have truncal erythema and an O 2 saturation of 70%.She was given four doses of 100 g albuterol aerosol via the endotracheal tube, and ventilation was attempted again with 8% sevoflurane in O 2 .During the next minute, it became possible to ventilate with small tidal volumes and ventilating pressures between 20 and 30 cm H 2 O. O 2 saturations began to increase, and wheezing breath sounds could now be heard.A treatment of 2.5 mg nebulized albuterol was administered via the endotracheal tube, and 50 mg benadryl was administered intravenously.During the ensuing 5 min, manual ventilation became progressively easier with tidal volumes increasing to 350 -450 ml at pressures of 15-20 cm H 2 O.The patient's O 2 saturation increased to 100%, breath sounds returned to normal, and the erythema dissipated.During this event, her blood pressure had ranged between 90/60 and 110/50 mmHg, and her pulse had ranged between 90 and 115 beats/min.Anesthesia was continued with 2-4% sevoflurane, 2 l/min O 2 , and 2 l/min N 2 O. Rocuronium, 10 mg, was required to assist with relaxation.Surgery proceeded uneventfully with the removal of an inflamed retrocecal appendix.Muscle relaxation was reversed with 1 mg neostigmine and 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate.With the patient spontaneously breathing, volumes of 250 -400 ml at a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min, and an equal train-of-four, nitrous oxide was discontinued.We elected to extubate the patient deeply, so after 5 min of 4% sevoflurane in O 2 , the stomach and oropharynx were thoroughly suctioned, and the endotracheal tube was removed.She continued to breathe 100% O 2 spontaneously, awoke, and was transferred to the postanesthesia care unit, where her O 2 saturation with room air was 99 -100% and her chest was clear.Chest radiography results were negative.She was transferred to the pediatric unit and was discharged on the second postoperative day. DiscussionThis patient had no factors predisposing her to a reactive airway.Of the anesthetics used for induction, midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol usually are not associated with bronchospasm.Increased airway pressure with or without wheezing and O 2 desaturation has been reported in clinical studies of rapacuronium.The manufacturer's package insert reports an incidence of 3.2%, with no data about the severity.Kahwaji et al. 1 reported bronchospasm and erythema that developed in an American Society of Anesthesiologists class I patient 30 s after 2 mg/kg rapacuronium and gradually subsided after salbutamol.Mild wheezing developed in a second patient after a dose of 1 mg/kg.These authors suggest that histamine release is responsible.Fleming et al. 2 studied 336 patients; half were intubated with 1 mg/kg succinylcholine, and half were intubated with 1.5 mg/kg rapacuronium.Bronchospasm, defined as wheezing, occurred in five of the rapacuronium patients, as opposed to only two of the succinylcholine patients.All but one of these patients had factors predisposing to broncho-This article is accompanied by an Editorial View.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesiologySame topicAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207