MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2130080612

Pengaruh Online Consumer Engagement dalam Website HijUp.com terhadap Kepercayaan Konsumen (Studi terhadap Konsumen HijUp.com)

2015· article· id· W2130080612 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dea Naomi

Notice bibliographique

RevueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas Bakrie · 2015
Typearticle
Langueid
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAdvertisingBusiness
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the effect of online consumer engagement applied by HijUp.com towards consumer trust. From Marketing Public Relations theory of consumer relations, the writer comes with consumer engagement topic that as an expansion strategy of consumer relations. In addition, the popularity of online field that causes a higher risk to consumer, making trust as the major issue that should be discussed when it comes to communication or marketing activities as the e-commerce company. This study used quantitative explanative approach, with multiple linier regressions to test the result. This study used online survey with 100 respondents as sample. The result showed a strong relationship between variables with determination coefficients of 0,607 which mean that consumer engagement effect on consumer trust of 60,7%. Meanwhile, the rest, 39,3%, is from the other factor outside regression model. There are three independent variables as elaboration of online consumer engagement concept; cognitive attachment, emotional attachment, and behavioural attachment. The result showed only two independent variables—cognitive attachment and emotional attachment—that has a significant effect on consumer trust, the other variable—behavioural attachment—did not have a significant effect. However, those three variables give a stimultant effect towards consumer trust. Keywords: Marketing Public Relations, Consumer Engagement, Consumer Trust, E-Commerce, HijUp.com DAFTAR PUSTAKA ARTIKEL Faulkner, Bill. Define Consumer Relations, diakses pada 8 Agustus 2015 dari http://www.ehow.com/about_6390671_define-consumer-relations.html Harvey, Michael. 15 Januari 2013. The Four Phases of E-Commerce Consumer Engagement, diakses pada tanggal 24 Februari 2015 dari http://www.retailtouchpoints.com/executive-viewpoints/2182-the-four-phases-of-e-commerce-consumer-engagement Howen, Allison. 3 Maret 2014. 5 Reasons Amazon Wins at E-Commerce, diakses pada 7 Juli 2015 dari http://www.websitemagazine.com/m/blog/post/31781?name=5-reasons-amazon-wins-at-e-commerceaApp=postsay=2014am=03ad=03aPostName=5-reasons-amazon-wins-at-e-commerce Moyer, Jennifer. 20 Agustus 2012. Measuring Blog Engagement: Testing a Four-Dimensional Scale, diakses pada tanggal 8 Agustus 2015 dari http://www.instituteforpr.org/measuring-blog-engagement-testing-a-four-dimensional-scale/ Noviandari, Lina. 10 September 2014. CEO HijUp: Follow Your Heart, Follow Your Dream, diakses pada tanggal 16 Juni 2015 dari http://id.techinasia.com/kisah-profil-ceo-hijup-diajeng-lestari/ Pratiwi, Gustyanita. 9 April 2013. Diajeng Lestari: Ingin Menjadi Wirausahawan yang Impactfull, diakses pada tanggal 16 Juni 2015 dari http://swa.co.id/headline/diajeng-lestari-ingin-menjadi-wirausahawan-yang-impactfull Soepardi, Hanni Soefia. 16 Oktober 2014. Tahun 2020 Indonesia Kiblat Fesyen Muslim Dunia, diakses pada tanggal 15 Februari 2015 dari http://www.antaranews.com/berita/459004/tahun-2020-Indonesia-kiblat-fesyen-muslim-dunia -----. 9 Mei 2011. Difference between Consumer and Customer, diakses pada tanggal 02 Maret 2015 dari http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-consumer-and-vs-customer/ BUKU Argenti, Paul. 2009. Corporate Communication, 5th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Bungin, Burhan. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, edisi ke-2. Jakarta:Kencana. Buttle, Francis. 2009. Customer Relationship Management: Concept and Tools. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd. Harris, Thomas L. dan Whalen, Patricia A. 2006. The Marketer's Guide to Public Relations in The 21st Century. Ohio: Thomson Higher Education. Irianto, Agus. 2004. Statistik: Konsep Dasar, Aplikasi, dan Pengembangannya. Jakarta: Kencana. Kotler, Philip dan Gary Armstrong. 2012. Principles of Marketing, 14th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson. Kriyantono, Rachmat. 2006. Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi: Disertai Contoh Praktis Riset Media, Public Relations, Advertising, Komunikasi Organisasi, Komunikasi Pemasaran. Jakarta: Kencana Lattimore, Dan et al. 2010. Public Relations: The Profession and The Practice, 3th Edition, diterjemahkan oleh Afrianto Daud, Jakrta: Salemba Humanika. Lattimore, Dan et al. 2012. Public Relations and The Practice, 4th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Muijs, Daniel. 2011. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: Sage Publications. Prajarto, Nunung. 2010. Metode Survei untuk Penelitian Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: FISIPOL UGM. Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. 2009. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi: Dilengkapi Contoh Analisis Statistik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Seitel, Fraser P. 2011. The Practice of Public Relations, 11th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson. Santoso, Singgih. 2010. Statistik Parametrik: Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo. Sanusi, Anwar. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Singh, Kultar. 2007. Quantitative Social Research Methods. New Delhi: Sage Publications. Sweeney, Susan dan Randall Craig. 2011. Social Media for Business: 101 Ways to Grow Your Business without Wasting Your Time. Canada: Maximum Press. JURNAL DAN SKRIPSI Anggasta, Giovani. 2014. Penerapan Elaboration Likelihood Model dalam Mempengaruhi Citra Organisasi. Karya Tugas Akhir (Skripsi). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Bakrie, Jakarta. Asosiasi Pengguna Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII). 2012. Profil Internet Indonesia 2012. Jakarta: APJII. Asosiasi Pengguna Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII). 2014. Penggunaan Internet Sektor Bisnis 2013. Jakarta: APJII. Brodie, et al. 2011. Consumer Engagement in a Virtual Brand Community: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Business Research 66, h. 105-114. Corbit, Brian J, et al. 2003. Trust and E-Commerce: A Study of Consumer Perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol.2, Issue 3, h. 203-215. Hussin, et al. 2009. A Consumer Perception Trust Model for E-Commerce. Laporan Penelitian. Fakulti Sains Komputer dan Sistem Maklumat Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Hollebeek, Linda. 2011b. Exploring Customer Brand Engagement Definition and Themes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol.19, No.7, h.555-573. Laudon, Kenneth C. dan Carol Guercio Traver. 2013. E-Commerce 2013, 9th Edition. New York: Pearson. Lee, et al. 2008. The Effect of Trust Dimensions on Relationship Commitment: The Relative Efficacy and Effect Symmetry, diakses pada tanggal 26 Februari 2015 dari http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/v35/naacr_vol35_105.pdf Malciute, Justine. 2012. Customer Brand Engagement on Online Social Media Platforms: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Analysis. Master Thesis. Department of Business Administration Aarhus University, Denmark. Mollen, Anne dan Hugh Wilson. 2009. Engagement, Telepresence and Interactivity in Online Consumer Experience: Reconsiling Scholastic and Managerial Perspectives. Journal of Business Research, Vol.63, No.9-10, h. 919-925. Nugraheni, Catherina Intan. 2012. Pengaruh Customer Engagement melalui Media Sosial Terhadap Kepercayaan Merek (Studi pada Facebook Sunsilk Indonesia). Karya Tugas Akhir (Skripsi). Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Patterson, et al. 2006. Understanding Customer Engagement in Services. Brisbane: AZMAC Proceedings. Purbo, Onno W. 2000. Memahami E-Commerce, diakses pada tanggal 24 Februari 2015 dari http://kalamkata.org/ebook/Indonesian/Modul05-ecommerce.pdf Satawedin, P. 2005. Marketing Public Relations (MPR): The Unbelievable Integrated Marketing Communication, diakses pada tanggal 1 Maret 2015 dari http://www.bu.ac.th/knowledgecenter/epaper/july_dec2005/patama.pdf Sudirman, I Made Stevana Adi Shantika. 2010. Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Online Terhadap Kepuasan, Komitmen, dan Loyalitas Nasabah dalam Penggunaan Internet Banking di Denpasar. Master Thesis. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Udayana, Denpasar. Sundar, S. Shyam et al. 2003. Explicating Web Site Interactivy: Impression Formation Effects in Political Campaign Sites, diakses pada tanggal 6 Agustus 2015 dari http://rcirib.ir/articles/pdfs/cd1%5CIngenta_Sage_Articles_on_194_225_11_89/Ingenta831.pdf Wang, Xiachao dan Gulara Abdullayeva. 2011. The Relationship Between Use of Social Media and Customer Relationship From E-commerce Model Perspective. Master Thesis. Department of Informatics of Lund University, Swedia. Vivek, S.D. 2009. A scale of consumer engagement. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Management/Marketing University of Alabama, USA. WEBSITE Cambridge Dictionary. Consumer Relations Definition, diakses pada tanggal 9 Agustus 2015 dari http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/customer-relations Central Intelligence Agency. 2014. The World Factbook, diakses pada tanggal 15 Februari 2015 dari https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html Internet World Stats. 2014. Usage and Population Statistics, diakses pada tanggal 15 Februari 2015 dari http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm ------. About Us, diakses pada tanggal 15 Februari 2015 dari http://www.hijup.com/aboutus

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,455
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas BakrieMême sujetSMEs Development and Digital MarketingTravaux en français237 207