Pengaruh Online Consumer Engagement dalam Website HijUp.com terhadap Kepercayaan Konsumen (Studi terhadap Konsumen HijUp.com)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of online consumer engagement applied by HijUp.com towards consumer trust. From Marketing Public Relations theory of consumer relations, the writer comes with consumer engagement topic that as an expansion strategy of consumer relations. In addition, the popularity of online field that causes a higher risk to consumer, making trust as the major issue that should be discussed when it comes to communication or marketing activities as the e-commerce company. This study used quantitative explanative approach, with multiple linier regressions to test the result. This study used online survey with 100 respondents as sample. The result showed a strong relationship between variables with determination coefficients of 0,607 which mean that consumer engagement effect on consumer trust of 60,7%. Meanwhile, the rest, 39,3%, is from the other factor outside regression model. There are three independent variables as elaboration of online consumer engagement concept; cognitive attachment, emotional attachment, and behavioural attachment. The result showed only two independent variables—cognitive attachment and emotional attachment—that has a significant effect on consumer trust, the other variable—behavioural attachment—did not have a significant effect. However, those three variables give a stimultant effect towards consumer trust. Keywords: Marketing Public Relations, Consumer Engagement, Consumer Trust, E-Commerce, HijUp.com DAFTAR PUSTAKA ARTIKEL Faulkner, Bill. Define Consumer Relations, diakses pada 8 Agustus 2015 dari http://www.ehow.com/about_6390671_define-consumer-relations.html Harvey, Michael. 15 Januari 2013. The Four Phases of E-Commerce Consumer Engagement, diakses pada tanggal 24 Februari 2015 dari http://www.retailtouchpoints.com/executive-viewpoints/2182-the-four-phases-of-e-commerce-consumer-engagement Howen, Allison. 3 Maret 2014. 5 Reasons Amazon Wins at E-Commerce, diakses pada 7 Juli 2015 dari http://www.websitemagazine.com/m/blog/post/31781?name=5-reasons-amazon-wins-at-e-commerceaApp=postsay=2014am=03ad=03aPostName=5-reasons-amazon-wins-at-e-commerce Moyer, Jennifer. 20 Agustus 2012. Measuring Blog Engagement: Testing a Four-Dimensional Scale, diakses pada tanggal 8 Agustus 2015 dari http://www.instituteforpr.org/measuring-blog-engagement-testing-a-four-dimensional-scale/ Noviandari, Lina. 10 September 2014. CEO HijUp: Follow Your Heart, Follow Your Dream, diakses pada tanggal 16 Juni 2015 dari http://id.techinasia.com/kisah-profil-ceo-hijup-diajeng-lestari/ Pratiwi, Gustyanita. 9 April 2013. Diajeng Lestari: Ingin Menjadi Wirausahawan yang Impactfull, diakses pada tanggal 16 Juni 2015 dari http://swa.co.id/headline/diajeng-lestari-ingin-menjadi-wirausahawan-yang-impactfull Soepardi, Hanni Soefia. 16 Oktober 2014. Tahun 2020 Indonesia Kiblat Fesyen Muslim Dunia, diakses pada tanggal 15 Februari 2015 dari http://www.antaranews.com/berita/459004/tahun-2020-Indonesia-kiblat-fesyen-muslim-dunia -----. 9 Mei 2011. Difference between Consumer and Customer, diakses pada tanggal 02 Maret 2015 dari http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-consumer-and-vs-customer/ BUKU Argenti, Paul. 2009. Corporate Communication, 5th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Bungin, Burhan. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, edisi ke-2. Jakarta:Kencana. Buttle, Francis. 2009. Customer Relationship Management: Concept and Tools. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd. Harris, Thomas L. dan Whalen, Patricia A. 2006. The Marketer's Guide to Public Relations in The 21st Century. Ohio: Thomson Higher Education. Irianto, Agus. 2004. Statistik: Konsep Dasar, Aplikasi, dan Pengembangannya. Jakarta: Kencana. Kotler, Philip dan Gary Armstrong. 2012. Principles of Marketing, 14th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson. Kriyantono, Rachmat. 2006. Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi: Disertai Contoh Praktis Riset Media, Public Relations, Advertising, Komunikasi Organisasi, Komunikasi Pemasaran. Jakarta: Kencana Lattimore, Dan et al. 2010. Public Relations: The Profession and The Practice, 3th Edition, diterjemahkan oleh Afrianto Daud, Jakrta: Salemba Humanika. Lattimore, Dan et al. 2012. Public Relations and The Practice, 4th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Muijs, Daniel. 2011. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: Sage Publications. Prajarto, Nunung. 2010. Metode Survei untuk Penelitian Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: FISIPOL UGM. Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. 2009. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi: Dilengkapi Contoh Analisis Statistik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Seitel, Fraser P. 2011. The Practice of Public Relations, 11th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson. Santoso, Singgih. 2010. Statistik Parametrik: Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo. Sanusi, Anwar. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Singh, Kultar. 2007. Quantitative Social Research Methods. New Delhi: Sage Publications. Sweeney, Susan dan Randall Craig. 2011. Social Media for Business: 101 Ways to Grow Your Business without Wasting Your Time. Canada: Maximum Press. JURNAL DAN SKRIPSI Anggasta, Giovani. 2014. Penerapan Elaboration Likelihood Model dalam Mempengaruhi Citra Organisasi. Karya Tugas Akhir (Skripsi). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Bakrie, Jakarta. Asosiasi Pengguna Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII). 2012. Profil Internet Indonesia 2012. Jakarta: APJII. Asosiasi Pengguna Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII). 2014. Penggunaan Internet Sektor Bisnis 2013. Jakarta: APJII. Brodie, et al. 2011. Consumer Engagement in a Virtual Brand Community: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Business Research 66, h. 105-114. Corbit, Brian J, et al. 2003. Trust and E-Commerce: A Study of Consumer Perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol.2, Issue 3, h. 203-215. Hussin, et al. 2009. A Consumer Perception Trust Model for E-Commerce. Laporan Penelitian. Fakulti Sains Komputer dan Sistem Maklumat Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Hollebeek, Linda. 2011b. Exploring Customer Brand Engagement Definition and Themes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol.19, No.7, h.555-573. Laudon, Kenneth C. dan Carol Guercio Traver. 2013. E-Commerce 2013, 9th Edition. New York: Pearson. Lee, et al. 2008. The Effect of Trust Dimensions on Relationship Commitment: The Relative Efficacy and Effect Symmetry, diakses pada tanggal 26 Februari 2015 dari http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/v35/naacr_vol35_105.pdf Malciute, Justine. 2012. Customer Brand Engagement on Online Social Media Platforms: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Analysis. Master Thesis. Department of Business Administration Aarhus University, Denmark. Mollen, Anne dan Hugh Wilson. 2009. Engagement, Telepresence and Interactivity in Online Consumer Experience: Reconsiling Scholastic and Managerial Perspectives. Journal of Business Research, Vol.63, No.9-10, h. 919-925. Nugraheni, Catherina Intan. 2012. Pengaruh Customer Engagement melalui Media Sosial Terhadap Kepercayaan Merek (Studi pada Facebook Sunsilk Indonesia). Karya Tugas Akhir (Skripsi). Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Patterson, et al. 2006. Understanding Customer Engagement in Services. Brisbane: AZMAC Proceedings. Purbo, Onno W. 2000. Memahami E-Commerce, diakses pada tanggal 24 Februari 2015 dari http://kalamkata.org/ebook/Indonesian/Modul05-ecommerce.pdf Satawedin, P. 2005. Marketing Public Relations (MPR): The Unbelievable Integrated Marketing Communication, diakses pada tanggal 1 Maret 2015 dari http://www.bu.ac.th/knowledgecenter/epaper/july_dec2005/patama.pdf Sudirman, I Made Stevana Adi Shantika. 2010. Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Online Terhadap Kepuasan, Komitmen, dan Loyalitas Nasabah dalam Penggunaan Internet Banking di Denpasar. Master Thesis. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Udayana, Denpasar. Sundar, S. Shyam et al. 2003. Explicating Web Site Interactivy: Impression Formation Effects in Political Campaign Sites, diakses pada tanggal 6 Agustus 2015 dari http://rcirib.ir/articles/pdfs/cd1%5CIngenta_Sage_Articles_on_194_225_11_89/Ingenta831.pdf Wang, Xiachao dan Gulara Abdullayeva. 2011. The Relationship Between Use of Social Media and Customer Relationship From E-commerce Model Perspective. Master Thesis. Department of Informatics of Lund University, Swedia. Vivek, S.D. 2009. A scale of consumer engagement. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Management/Marketing University of Alabama, USA. WEBSITE Cambridge Dictionary. Consumer Relations Definition, diakses pada tanggal 9 Agustus 2015 dari http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/customer-relations Central Intelligence Agency. 2014. The World Factbook, diakses pada tanggal 15 Februari 2015 dari https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html Internet World Stats. 2014. Usage and Population Statistics, diakses pada tanggal 15 Februari 2015 dari http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm ------. About Us, diakses pada tanggal 15 Februari 2015 dari http://www.hijup.com/aboutus
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it