Notice bibliographique
Résumé
his article will endeavour to accomplish four things: to point out some of the more common challenges in the assessment and management of adult patients with congenital heart defects (CHD); to review in general which adult patients with CHD do not need to be seen in specialised adult CHD centres; to review which patients should be seen in such specialised centres; and to review the resources which should thereby be available to them in the expert centres. c TIPS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH CHD Atrial septal defectsEven the humble atrial septal defect (ASD) has its complexities.First, not all ASDs need to be closed.As a rule, an ASD worth closing should be at least 10 mm in diameter and be associated with clear right ventricular dilation.There is a consensus view that all ASDs meeting these criteria should be closed unless there are reasons not to do so. 1 Moreover, the ASD should be closed when diagnosed, and preferably before the age of 25 years if the goal of treatment is to avoid premature mortality and morbidity.2 The dilemma as to whether to recommend ASD closure in the asymptomatic patient has eased greatly now that device closure of ASDs can be done so successfully and easily.That said, one needs to have access to a skilled interventionalist and modern devices to make this promise relevant.Estimation of the size, the number, and type(s) of atrial defects can be difficult at times.While transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) will usually confirm the diagnosis of an ASD, it will seldom identify whether multiple ASDs are present, an issue that must be evaluated by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) before considering device closure of the defect.Anomalous pulmonary venous drainage (APVD) must also be excluded before proceeding to device closure.While most isolated ASDs are of the secundum type, it is important to recognise if a primum (∼7%) or sinus venosus defect (∼8%) is present, since device closure is inappropriate, and since referral to a congenital heart surgeon should be considered.The presence of associated anomalous pulmonary venous drainage should be looked for in all ASDs, usually with TOE or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to ensure that all four pulmonary veins drain into the left atrium.The surgeon or the interventional cardiologist should have this information before the procedure.If anomalous pulmonary venous drainage is present, device closure is not appropriate, and referral to a congenital heart surgeon should be considered.All patient candidates for transvenous pacing should be evaluated for an ASD or possibly even a patent foramen ovale, since they are at increased risk of strokes and systemic embolic events through the embolisation of pacing lead thrombi. Ventricular septal defectsWhile small ventricular septal defects (VSDs) may be seen in practice, it is important to look for associations that may require repair.First, check that there is no more than mild associated aortic regurgitation.In some patients outlet VSDs 3 occur which can lead to aortic cusp prolapse and clinically important aortic regurgitation.Such patients should be evaluated as possible surgical candidates.Other patients with what is believed to be small VSDs may also have important right ventricular outflow tract obstruction causing right ventricular hypertrophy, symptoms, and atrial flutter.They too are surgical candidates.Other patients believed to have small VSDs 4 may dilate the left heart chambers in follow up, which in turn may lead to atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure.A periodic TTE and awareness of this issue should avoid this happening. Patent ductus arteriosusIsolated patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) occurs in four forms:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».