Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IDSA/ATS Guidelines for CAP in Adults • CID 2007:44 (Suppl 2) • S31 33.A longer duration of therapy may be needed if initial therapy was not active against the identified pathogen or if it was complicated by extrapulmonary infection, such as meningitis or endocarditis.(Weak recommendation; level III evidence.)Other Treatment Considerations 34.Patients with CAP who have persistent septic shock despite adequate fluid resuscitation should be considered for treatment with drotrecogin alfa activated within 24 h of admission.(Weak recommendation; level II evidence.)35.Hypotensive, fluid-resuscitated patients with severe CAP should be screened for occult adrenal insufficiency.(Moderate recommendation; level II evidence.)36.Patients with hypoxemia or respiratory distress should receive a cautious trial of noninvasive ventilation unless they require immediate intubation because of severe hypoxemia (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, !150) and bilateral alveolar infiltrates.(Moderate recommendation; level I evidence.)37. Low-tidal-volume ventilation (6 cm 3 /kg of ideal body weight) should be used for patients undergoing ventilation who have diffuse bilateral pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome.(Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)Management of Nonresponding Pneumonia Definitions and classification.38.The use of a systematic classification of possible causes of failure to respond, based on time of onset and type of failure (table 11), is recommended.(Moderate recommendation; level II evidence.)As many as 15% of patients with CAP may not respond appropriately to initial antibiotic therapy.A systematic approach to these patients (table 11) will help to determine the cause.Because determination of the cause of failure is more accurate if the original microbiological etiology is known, risk factors for nonresponse or deterioration (table 12) figure prominently in the list of situations in which more aggressive and/ or extensive initial diagnostic testing is warranted (table 5).Prevention (see table 13) 39.All persons у50 years of age, others at risk for influenza complications, household contacts of high-risk persons, and health care workers should receive inactivated influenza vaccine as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.(Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)40.The intranasally administered live attenuated vaccine is an alternative vaccine formulation for some persons 5-49 years of age without chronic underlying diseases, including immunodeficiency, asthma, or chronic medical conditions.(Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)41.Health care workers in inpatient and outpatient settings and long-term care facilities should receive annual influenza immunization.(Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)42.Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine is recommended for persons у65 years of age and for those with selected high-risk concurrent diseases, according to current Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines.(Strong recommendation; level II evidence.)43.Vaccination status should be assessed at the time of hospital admission for all patients, especially those with medical illnesses.(Moderate recommendation; level III evidence.)44.Vaccination may be performed either at hospital discharge or during outpatient treatment.(Moderate recommendation; level III evidence.)45.Influenza vaccine should be offered to persons at hospital discharge or during outpatient treatment during the fall and winter.(Strong recommendation; level III evidence.)46.Smoking cessation should be a goal for persons hospitalized with CAP who smoke.(Moderate recommendation; level III evidence.)47.Smokers who will not quit should also be vaccinated for both pneumococcus and influenza.(Weak recommendation; level III evidence.)48.Cases of pneumonia that are of public health concern should be reported immediately to the state or local health department.(Strong recommendation; level III evidence.)49.Respiratory hygiene measures, including the use of hand hygiene and masks or tissues for patients with cough, should be used in outpatient settings and EDs as a means to reduce the spread of respiratory infections.(Strong recommendation; level III evidence.)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».