MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2133979383 · doi:10.1086/511159

Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults

2007· article· en· W2133979383 on OpenAlexaff
Lionel A. Mandell, Richard G. Wunderink, Antonio Anzueto, John G. Bartlett, G. Douglas Campbell, Nathan C. Dean, Scott F. Dowell, Thomas M. File, Daniel M. Musher, Michael S. Niederman, Antoní Torres, Cynthia G. Whitney

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
FundersSanofiPfizerAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyCenters for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesGlaxoSmithKlineAmerican Thoracic Society
KeywordsMedicinePneumoniaCommunity-acquired pneumoniaIntensive care medicineConsensus conferenceFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IDSA/ATS Guidelines for CAP in Adults • CID 2007:44 (Suppl 2) • S31 33.A longer duration of therapy may be needed if initial therapy was not active against the identified pathogen or if it was complicated by extrapulmonary infection, such as meningitis or endocarditis.(Weak recommendation; level III evidence.)Other Treatment Considerations 34.Patients with CAP who have persistent septic shock despite adequate fluid resuscitation should be considered for treatment with drotrecogin alfa activated within 24 h of admission.(Weak recommendation; level II evidence.)35.Hypotensive, fluid-resuscitated patients with severe CAP should be screened for occult adrenal insufficiency.(Moderate recommendation; level II evidence.)36.Patients with hypoxemia or respiratory distress should receive a cautious trial of noninvasive ventilation unless they require immediate intubation because of severe hypoxemia (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, !150) and bilateral alveolar infiltrates.(Moderate recommendation; level I evidence.)37. Low-tidal-volume ventilation (6 cm 3 /kg of ideal body weight) should be used for patients undergoing ventilation who have diffuse bilateral pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome.(Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)Management of Nonresponding Pneumonia Definitions and classification.38.The use of a systematic classification of possible causes of failure to respond, based on time of onset and type of failure (table 11), is recommended.(Moderate recommendation; level II evidence.)As many as 15% of patients with CAP may not respond appropriately to initial antibiotic therapy.A systematic approach to these patients (table 11) will help to determine the cause.Because determination of the cause of failure is more accurate if the original microbiological etiology is known, risk factors for nonresponse or deterioration (table 12) figure prominently in the list of situations in which more aggressive and/ or extensive initial diagnostic testing is warranted (table 5).Prevention (see table 13) 39.All persons у50 years of age, others at risk for influenza complications, household contacts of high-risk persons, and health care workers should receive inactivated influenza vaccine as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.(Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)40.The intranasally administered live attenuated vaccine is an alternative vaccine formulation for some persons 5-49 years of age without chronic underlying diseases, including immunodeficiency, asthma, or chronic medical conditions.(Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)41.Health care workers in inpatient and outpatient settings and long-term care facilities should receive annual influenza immunization.(Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)42.Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine is recommended for persons у65 years of age and for those with selected high-risk concurrent diseases, according to current Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines.(Strong recommendation; level II evidence.)43.Vaccination status should be assessed at the time of hospital admission for all patients, especially those with medical illnesses.(Moderate recommendation; level III evidence.)44.Vaccination may be performed either at hospital discharge or during outpatient treatment.(Moderate recommendation; level III evidence.)45.Influenza vaccine should be offered to persons at hospital discharge or during outpatient treatment during the fall and winter.(Strong recommendation; level III evidence.)46.Smoking cessation should be a goal for persons hospitalized with CAP who smoke.(Moderate recommendation; level III evidence.)47.Smokers who will not quit should also be vaccinated for both pneumococcus and influenza.(Weak recommendation; level III evidence.)48.Cases of pneumonia that are of public health concern should be reported immediately to the state or local health department.(Strong recommendation; level III evidence.)49.Respiratory hygiene measures, including the use of hand hygiene and masks or tissues for patients with cough, should be used in outpatient settings and EDs as a means to reduce the spread of respiratory infections.(Strong recommendation; level III evidence.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6,244
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious Diseases→Same topicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections→French-language works237,207→