Notice bibliographique
Résumé
bush culture for a bush country: unfinished manifesto bush is calling to some of us. it invites to add, multiply and supplement its signs and texts; to write straight off trail that is written through it; to continue trace that meanders and guides some of through its multiplicities, its polymorphic playfulness, its multivoicedness; and, of course, to leave that track and create others. a coming community? perhaps. something unnamed that is in and of bush. bush can be deployed as allegory for something some of desire, something some of us, those who carry western culture with every step of way, can almost touch but never quite reach. when many of are in bush, we bring with that which is not bush. so we travel uneasily through it. bush designates that vast part of country that remains outside of strip malls, covered for most part in rock, swamp, and water, though some of it is tundra and some of it is mountain and some of it is prairie. a bush culture is a culture that is of bush. and bush, unlike wilderness, allows to think a lived relation to and in this landscape. first nations cultures, in my view, are bush cultures. most important fracture - line in canadian culture is not and has never been linguistic one that separates franco from anglo. most important cultural fracture line has been division between aboriginal and - aboriginal, and conversations that cross this boundary. many other differences, literally, pale by comparison. but some part of canadian culture, that non - existent that pretends to claim us all, is also of bush. if we can have bush, if we can have our bush leagues, bush doctors, bush texts, bush bikes, bush pilots, bush whackers, bush radios, bush camps, we might as well imagine what it would be to have a bush country. we have been asked, enjoined, to think unthinkable (which is actually an rather than the unthinkable, which is actually a thinkable unthinkable): canada without quebec. what will happen, what will remain? what will happen, of course, can be specified with acute philosophical precision: nothing. nothing will happen when quebec leaves. we will barely awaken morning after to sleepwalk our way through other days. those of who are fortunate and privileged will go to our workplaces, drive or ride along same familiar roads, sit in same offices, read same newspapers. sky will sit firmly in its position. nothing will have happened. those who are not fortunate and privileged will continue, as before, to struggle to survive and to change society. canada is and will be that great postmodern nation for this precise reason: nothing ever happens here. that's why some of love it. at least, let this be shield under which we protect our subversive activities from normalizing gaze of imperial power we border. some calculators will undoubtedly be at work in some other offices, and these will have some long term material effects. interest rates will rise, one speculates; bond ratings will lower, and firmer voices in favour of government deficit - cutting will emerge in all their masculine strength to deploy their codes of discipline and restraint. and these things, which seem to go ahead regardless of quebec, will continue to be barely noticeable, except to those who are thrown from their jobs, houses, lives, as cost that never makes it into formulas of calculators. what will remain? this is question of moment. again, what will remain is, sadly, far too predictable. canada will remain canada. not english canada nor english speaking canada - a designation that has never had much accuracy - since at least in nunavut and denendeh questions of language will remain acute. nor t.r.o.c., rest of canada, a delightful acronym that only serves to centre quebec at expense of some of and identifies some of through our wounds. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».