Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The good intentions, and good deeds, of liberalism and contemporary liberal state notwithstanding, there have been myriad countervailing pressures working against formation of communities in postmodern America, and it is on two of these that I wish to focus here: first, assaults on community formation by governmental and corporate entities; and, second, assaults on community formation by ever-accelerating embourgeoisement of American culture. The novels of Thomas Pynchon, William Gaddis, Norman Mailer, John Edgar Wideman, Don DeLillo, Kathy Acker, and Richard Ford, among number of others, provide rich illustrations of entropy of community in contemporary America, and analyses offered here will draw from this important body of literature as well as from contemporary political theory. In The End of History (1992), Francis Fukuyama advances view that is directional, and that its directional bias in late twentieth century leads inexorably to political liberalism. (1) Fukuyama claims that liberalism has proven more adept than any other political system at satisfying the whole man simultaneously, his mason, his desire, and thymos. (2) A term drawn from Plato's Republic, refers to people's self-esteem, to their innate sense of justice. Thymos creates in people desire for recognition. (3) Even if Fukuyama is correct and liberalism can be said to have vanquished its ideological antagonists--notably communitarianism, in both its right- and left-wing modalities, and libertarianism--those countries that unambiguously embrace this political form are hardly utopias, and United States is clearly not one. Indeed, no less student of contemporary American society than William Jefferson Clinton has called attention to fragmentation of national soul. Addressing party delegates at 1996 Democratic National Convention in his nomination acceptance speech, Clinton issued challenge to himself and all Americans: We must make basic bargain of responsibility and opportunity real for all Americans and we must build strong and united American community. (4) One might be tempted to see this call for refurbished notion of American community or, better, alliance of communities, as Peter Simpson calls liberal state, as nothing more than hollow, self-promotional political oratory. (5) Taken in isolation, and cynically, Clinton's hortatory sentiments might well be summarily dismissed on these grounds alone. Yet, in these early years of twenty-first century, United States is indeed preoccupied with community, with its loss, with need for its conceptual and social renovation, and Clinton's concern is also nation's. Certainly, in postmodern America, thymos of many social theorists, philosophers, and novelists is affronted by historical circumstance. As Fukuyama himself is well aware, of history has not been marked by end of human suffering. Consequently, several questions come immediately to fore here. How can what is arguably best actually existent political system that humankind has ever conjured up be so demonstrably imperfect, even dystopian in minds of some? Is system that has, again arguably, won endgame of complex and protracted ideological match capable of metacritical reflection, of self-correctional gesture? Is justice itself an inherently contestable concept under liberalism and hence not subject to any definitive codification? Finally, and crucially, what vision of futurity does American liberalism embrace? Robert Bellah and his colleagues provide us with what seems serviceable definition of community in Habits of Heart, their influential study of individualism and social morality in America: a community is group of people who are socially interdependent, who participate together in discussion and decision making, and who share certain practices ... that both define community and are nurtured by it. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».