MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2143385066

The Quest for Community in American Postmodern Fiction

2003· article· en· W2143385066 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Jerry Versava

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational fiction review · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueContemporary Literature and Criticism
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPostmodernismIdeologyLiberalismPoliticsAestheticsSociologyJust societyState (computer science)Classical liberalismLawEnd of historyEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyPolitical scienceEpistemology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The good intentions, and good deeds, of liberalism and contemporary liberal state notwithstanding, there have been myriad countervailing pressures working against formation of communities in postmodern America, and it is on two of these that I wish to focus here: first, assaults on community formation by governmental and corporate entities; and, second, assaults on community formation by ever-accelerating embourgeoisement of American culture. The novels of Thomas Pynchon, William Gaddis, Norman Mailer, John Edgar Wideman, Don DeLillo, Kathy Acker, and Richard Ford, among number of others, provide rich illustrations of entropy of community in contemporary America, and analyses offered here will draw from this important body of literature as well as from contemporary political theory. In The End of History (1992), Francis Fukuyama advances view that is directional, and that its directional bias in late twentieth century leads inexorably to political liberalism. (1) Fukuyama claims that liberalism has proven more adept than any other political system at satisfying the whole man simultaneously, his mason, his desire, and thymos. (2) A term drawn from Plato's Republic, refers to people's self-esteem, to their innate sense of justice. Thymos creates in people desire for recognition. (3) Even if Fukuyama is correct and liberalism can be said to have vanquished its ideological antagonists--notably communitarianism, in both its right- and left-wing modalities, and libertarianism--those countries that unambiguously embrace this political form are hardly utopias, and United States is clearly not one. Indeed, no less student of contemporary American society than William Jefferson Clinton has called attention to fragmentation of national soul. Addressing party delegates at 1996 Democratic National Convention in his nomination acceptance speech, Clinton issued challenge to himself and all Americans: We must make basic bargain of responsibility and opportunity real for all Americans and we must build strong and united American community. (4) One might be tempted to see this call for refurbished notion of American community or, better, alliance of communities, as Peter Simpson calls liberal state, as nothing more than hollow, self-promotional political oratory. (5) Taken in isolation, and cynically, Clinton's hortatory sentiments might well be summarily dismissed on these grounds alone. Yet, in these early years of twenty-first century, United States is indeed preoccupied with community, with its loss, with need for its conceptual and social renovation, and Clinton's concern is also nation's. Certainly, in postmodern America, thymos of many social theorists, philosophers, and novelists is affronted by historical circumstance. As Fukuyama himself is well aware, of history has not been marked by end of human suffering. Consequently, several questions come immediately to fore here. How can what is arguably best actually existent political system that humankind has ever conjured up be so demonstrably imperfect, even dystopian in minds of some? Is system that has, again arguably, won endgame of complex and protracted ideological match capable of metacritical reflection, of self-correctional gesture? Is justice itself an inherently contestable concept under liberalism and hence not subject to any definitive codification? Finally, and crucially, what vision of futurity does American liberalism embrace? Robert Bellah and his colleagues provide us with what seems serviceable definition of community in Habits of Heart, their influential study of individualism and social morality in America: a community is group of people who are socially interdependent, who participate together in discussion and decision making, and who share certain practices ... that both define community and are nurtured by it. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,975
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,240

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2003
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational fiction reviewMême sujetContemporary Literature and CriticismTravaux en français237 207