The Quest for Community in American Postmodern Fiction

The good intentions, and good deeds, of liberalism and contemporary liberal state notwithstanding, there have been myriad countervailing pressures working against formation of communities in postmodern America, and it is on two of these that I wish to focus here: first, assaults on community formation by governmental and corporate entities; and, second, assaults on community formation by ever-accelerating embourgeoisement of American culture. The novels of Thomas Pynchon, William Gaddis, Norman Mailer, John Edgar Wideman, Don DeLillo, Kathy Acker, and Richard Ford, among number of others, provide rich illustrations of entropy of community in contemporary America, and analyses offered here will draw from this important body of literature as well as from contemporary political theory. In The End of History (1992), Francis Fukuyama advances view that is directional, and that its directional bias in late twentieth century leads inexorably to political liberalism. (1) Fukuyama claims that liberalism has proven more adept than any other political system at satisfying the whole man simultaneously, his mason, his desire, and thymos. (2) A term drawn from Plato's Republic, refers to people's self-esteem, to their innate sense of justice. Thymos creates in people desire for recognition. (3) Even if Fukuyama is correct and liberalism can be said to have vanquished its ideological antagonists--notably communitarianism, in both its right- and left-wing modalities, and libertarianism--those countries that unambiguously embrace this political form are hardly utopias, and United States is clearly not one. Indeed, no less student of contemporary American society than William Jefferson Clinton has called attention to fragmentation of national soul. Addressing party delegates at 1996 Democratic National Convention in his nomination acceptance speech, Clinton issued challenge to himself and all Americans: We must make basic bargain of responsibility and opportunity real for all Americans and we must build strong and united American community. (4) One might be tempted to see this call for refurbished notion of American community or, better, alliance of communities, as Peter Simpson calls liberal state, as nothing more than hollow, self-promotional political oratory. (5) Taken in isolation, and cynically, Clinton's hortatory sentiments might well be summarily dismissed on these grounds alone. Yet, in these early years of twenty-first century, United States is indeed preoccupied with community, with its loss, with need for its conceptual and social renovation, and Clinton's concern is also nation's. Certainly, in postmodern America, thymos of many social theorists, philosophers, and novelists is affronted by historical circumstance. As Fukuyama himself is well aware, of history has not been marked by end of human suffering. Consequently, several questions come immediately to fore here. How can what is arguably best actually existent political system that humankind has ever conjured up be so demonstrably imperfect, even dystopian in minds of some? Is system that has, again arguably, won endgame of complex and protracted ideological match capable of metacritical reflection, of self-correctional gesture? Is justice itself an inherently contestable concept under liberalism and hence not subject to any definitive codification? Finally, and crucially, what vision of futurity does American liberalism embrace? Robert Bellah and his colleagues provide us with what seems serviceable definition of community in Habits of Heart, their influential study of individualism and social morality in America: a community is group of people who are socially interdependent, who participate together in discussion and decision making, and who share certain practices ... that both define community and are nurtured by it. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.