Surgical management of tethered cord syndrome in adults: indications, techniques, and long-term outcomes in 60 patients
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECT: The adult presentation of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is well recognized but continues to pose significant diagnostic and management challenges. The authors performed a retrospective study of clinical outcomes after neurosurgical intervention in 60 adults with TCS. METHODS: All patients who underwent detethering surgery for caudal cord tethering at Toronto Western Hospital between August 1993 and 2004 were identified. Their clinical charts, operative records, and follow-up data were reviewed. Detethering procedures were performed in 62 patients (age range 17-72 years) for TCS of various origins. Long-term (mean 41.5 months) follow-up data were obtained in 60 patients. The tethering lesions were tight terminal filum in 29 patients, postrepair myelomeningocele in 15, lipomyelomeningocele/lipoma in nine, split cord malformation in four, and arachnoidal adhesions in three. Fifty-nine patients presented with progressive pain and/or neurological dysfunction. One patient underwent prophylactic sectioning of the terminal filum. Most patients (71%) had bladder dysfunction at presentation. Microsurgical release of the tethered cord was performed in each case while using multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The most common complication was cerebrospinal fluid leakage, which occurred in nine patients and was managed by reinforcement sutures in four patients, temporary external drainage in three, and the placement of a lumboperitoneal shunt in two. Infective complications included superficial wound infection in three patients, meningitis in one, and urinary tract infection in one. One patient who had undergone multiple previous intradural procedures experienced worsened foot weakness postoperatively. Another patient experienced temporary unilateral lower-limb numbness. At follow up, improvement was noted in the majority of patients presenting with back (78%) and leg (83%) pain. Improvement was more likely in patients with preoperative motor weakness than in those with sensory deficits. Overall, neurological status was improved or stabilized in 90% of patients. Subjective improvement in bladder function was noted in 50% of patients with bladder dysfunction at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery in adult patients with TCS is safe and effective for improving pain and neurological status in the majority of patients; however, patients who have undergone previous intradural detethering procedures in general fare less well, and considerable judgment is required in their management.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle