MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145329317 · doi:10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.123

Surgical management of tethered cord syndrome in adults: indications, techniques, and long-term outcomes in 60 patients

2006· article· en· W2145329317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Spine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryComplicationSpinal cordRetrospective cohort studyUrinary systemMeningitisPresentation (obstetrics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECT: The adult presentation of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is well recognized but continues to pose significant diagnostic and management challenges. The authors performed a retrospective study of clinical outcomes after neurosurgical intervention in 60 adults with TCS. METHODS: All patients who underwent detethering surgery for caudal cord tethering at Toronto Western Hospital between August 1993 and 2004 were identified. Their clinical charts, operative records, and follow-up data were reviewed. Detethering procedures were performed in 62 patients (age range 17-72 years) for TCS of various origins. Long-term (mean 41.5 months) follow-up data were obtained in 60 patients. The tethering lesions were tight terminal filum in 29 patients, postrepair myelomeningocele in 15, lipomyelomeningocele/lipoma in nine, split cord malformation in four, and arachnoidal adhesions in three. Fifty-nine patients presented with progressive pain and/or neurological dysfunction. One patient underwent prophylactic sectioning of the terminal filum. Most patients (71%) had bladder dysfunction at presentation. Microsurgical release of the tethered cord was performed in each case while using multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The most common complication was cerebrospinal fluid leakage, which occurred in nine patients and was managed by reinforcement sutures in four patients, temporary external drainage in three, and the placement of a lumboperitoneal shunt in two. Infective complications included superficial wound infection in three patients, meningitis in one, and urinary tract infection in one. One patient who had undergone multiple previous intradural procedures experienced worsened foot weakness postoperatively. Another patient experienced temporary unilateral lower-limb numbness. At follow up, improvement was noted in the majority of patients presenting with back (78%) and leg (83%) pain. Improvement was more likely in patients with preoperative motor weakness than in those with sensory deficits. Overall, neurological status was improved or stabilized in 90% of patients. Subjective improvement in bladder function was noted in 50% of patients with bladder dysfunction at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery in adult patients with TCS is safe and effective for improving pain and neurological status in the majority of patients; however, patients who have undergone previous intradural detethering procedures in general fare less well, and considerable judgment is required in their management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it