Notice bibliographique
Résumé
No AccessPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)Article1 Jun 2003Getting Acquainted With the Esophagus Caryn S. Easterling Caryn S. Easterling Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukee, WI Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/sasd12.2.3 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Crist, J., Gidda, J. S., & Goyal, R. K. (1984). Intramural mechanism of esophageal peristalsis: Roles of cholinergic and noncholinergic nerves..Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 81, 3595–3599. Google Scholar Cook, I. J., Dent, J., Shannon, S., & Collins, S. M. (1987). Measurement of upper esophageal sphincter pressure: Effect of acute emotional stress..Gastroenterology, 93, 526–532. Google Scholar Cook, I. J., Dodds, W. J., Dantas, R. O., Massey, B., Kern, M. K., Lang, I. M., Brasseur, J. G., & Hogan, W. J. (1989) Opening mechanism of the human upper esophageal sphincter.American Journal of Physiology, 257, G748–G759. Google Scholar Corso, M. J., Pursnani, K. G., & Mohiuddin, M. A. (1998). Globus sensation is associated with hypertensive upper esophageal sphincter but not with gastroesophageal reflux..Digestive Disease Science, 43, 1513–1517. Google Scholar Dent, J., Dodds, W. J., Friedman, R. H., Sekiguchi, T., Hogan, W. J., Arndorfer, R. C., & Petrie, D. J. (1980) Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 65, 256–267. Google Scholar Diamant, N. E. (1989). Physiology of esophageal motor function..Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, 18,(2), 179–194. Google Scholar Dodds, W. J., Hogan, W. J., & Stewart, E. T. (1974). Effects of intra-abdominal pressure on esophageal peristalsis..Journal of Applied Physiology, 37, 378–385. Google Scholar Dodds, W. J., Stewart, E. T., Hodges, D., & Zboralske, F. F. (1973). Movement of the feline esophagus associated with respiration and p.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 52, 1–13. Google Scholar Dudnich, R. S., Castell, J. A., & Castell, D. O. (1992). Abnormal upper esophageal sphincter function in achalasia..American Journal of Gastroenterology, 87, 1712–1715. Google Scholar Edmundowicz, S., & Clouse, R. E. (1991). Shortenting of the esophagus in response to swallowing..American Journal of Physiology, 260, G512–G516. Google Scholar Gerhardt, D. C., Castell, D. O., Winship, D. H., & Shuck, T. J. (1980). Esophageal dysfunction in esophagopharyngeal regurgitation..Gastroenterology, 78, 893–897 Google Scholar Gilbert, R. J., & Dodds, W. J. (1986). Effect of selective muscarinic antagonists on peristaltic contractions in opossum smooth muscle..American Journal of Physiology, 250, G50–G57. Google Scholar Goyal, R. K. (1989). Muscarinic receptor subtypes, physiology and clinical implications..New England Journal of Medicine, 321, 1022–1028. Google Scholar Hollis, J. B., & Castell, D. O. (1976). Effects of cholinergic stimulation on human esophageal peristalsis..Journal of Applied Physiology, 40, 40–43. Google Scholar Kahrilas, P. J., Clouse, R. E., & Hogan, W. J. (1994). American Gastroen-terological Association technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry..Gastroenterology, 107, 1865–84. Google Scholar Kahrilas, P. J., Dent, J., Dodds, W. J., Hogan, W. J., Arndorfer, R. C. (1987). A method for continuous monitoring of upper esophageal sphincter pressure..Digestive Disease Science, 32, 121–128. Google Scholar Kahrilas, P. J., Dodds, W. J., Dent, J., Haeberle, B., Hogan, W. J., & Arndorfer, R. C. (1987). Effect of sleep, spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux and a meal on upper esophageal sphincter pressure in normal human volunteers..Gastroenterology, 92, 466–471 Google Scholar Kahrilas, P. J., Dodds, W. J., Dent, J., Logemann, J. A., & Shaker, R. (1988). Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutition..Gastroenterology, 95, 52–62. Google Scholar Kahrilas, P. J., Logemann, J. A., Krugler, C., & Flanagan, E. (1991). Volitional augmentation of upper esophageal sphincter opening during swallowing..American Journal of Physiology, 260, G450–G456. Google Scholar Lang, I. M., & Shaker, R. (1994). An update on the physiology of the components of the upper esophageal sphincter..Dysphagia, 9, 229–232. Google Scholar Meyer, G. W., Austin, R. M., Brady, C. E., & Castell, D. O. (1986). Muscle anatomy of the human esophagus..Journal of Clinical Gastroenterolenterology, 8, 131–134. Google Scholar Meyer, G. W., Gerhardt, D. C., & Castell, D. O. (1980). Human esophageal response to rapid swallowing: Muscle refractory period or neural inhibition?.American Journal of Physiology, 241, G129–G136. Google Scholar Mittal, R. K., Rochester, D. F., & McCallum, R. W. (1989). Sphincteric action of the diaphragm during a relaxed lower esophageal sphincter in h.American Journal of Physiology, 256, G139–G144. Google Scholar Ott, D. J. (1990). Radiographic techniques and efficacy in evaluating esophageal dysphagia..Dysphagia, 5, 192–203. Google Scholar Patterson, W. G., Anderson, M. A., & Anand, N. (1992). Pharmacological characterization of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation induced by swallowing, vagal efferent nerve stimulation, and esophageal distension..Canadian Journal of Physiological Pharmacology, 70, 1011–1015 Google Scholar Ren, J., Shaker, R., Kusano, M., Podvrsan, B., Metwally, N., Dua, K. S., & Sui, Z. (1995). Effect of aging on the secondary esoph-ageal peristalsis: Presbyesophagus revisited..American Journal of Physiology, 268, G772–G779. Google Scholar Sanders, K. M., & Ward, S. M. (1992). Nitric oxide as a mediator of nonadrenergic noncholinergic neurotransmission..American Journal of Physiology, 262, G379–G392. Google Scholar Shaker, R., Ren, J., Podvrsan, B., Dodds, W. J., Hogan, W. J., Kern, M., Hoffmann, R., & Hintz, J. (1993). Effect of aging and bolus variables on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter motor function..American Journal of Physiology, 264, G427–G432. Google Scholar Shaker, R., Kern, M., Bardan, E., Taylor, A., Stewart, E. T., Hoffmann, R. G., Arndorfer, R. C., Hofmann, C., & Bonevier, J. (1997). Augmentation of deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter opening in the elderly by exercise..American Journal of Physiology, 272, G1518–G1522. Google Scholar Shaker, R., Easterling, C., Kern, M., Nitschke, T., Massey, B., Daniels, S., Grande, B., Kazandjian, M., & Dikeman, K. (2002). Rehabilitation of swallowing by exercise in tube-fed patients with pharyngeal dysphagia secondary to abnormal UES opening..Gastroenterology, 122, 1314–1321. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 12Issue 2June 2003Pages: 3-7 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jun 1, 2003 Metrics Downloaded 43 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2003 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,487 | 0,258 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».