MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2155633619 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.207514

‘Spotting’ afferent pathways of hindgut sensations – role of endothelin‐3 signalling

2011· letter· en· W2155633619 sur OpenAlexaff
Michael Beyak

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Physiology · 2011
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Établissements canadiensKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHindgutAfferentNeuroscienceSignallingEndothelin receptorCommunicationBiologyCell biologyPsychologyChemistryReceptorGeneticsEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Colorectal distension can result in both painful and non-painful sensations. These sensations of pain are carried by afferent nerves innervating the distal gut, but little is known about the specific afferent classes that mediate painful sensations, as well as responses to noxious and non-noxious colorectal stimulation. This is not only of scholarly importance, but also important in the clinical world, as many common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome and colitis, are manifested by pain arising from the distal colon. In a recent issue of The Journal of Physiology, Zagorodnyuk et al. (2011) have used an interesting approach to provide us with further insight into this problem. They utilized a strain of mice deficient in endothelin-3 production, known as the ‘lethal spotted’ (ls/ls) mouse (so named from their unique spotted coat). This mouse is known to lack enteric ganglia in the distal colorectum, and thus serves as a mouse model of Hirschsprung's disease, a rare motility disorder characterized by failure of enteric neuronal development in the bowel – which leads to varying degrees of functional obstruction. The disorder usually presents in childhood, but milder forms may be unrecognized until adulthood (de Lorijn et al. 2007). The authors demonstrated that visceromotor reflexes (abdominal wall contractions in response to colorectal distension – often used as a correlate of visceral pain in rodents) are significantly attenuated in ls/ls mice, and that there is a loss of spinal innervation of the rectum in these animals. Recordings from afferent nerve fibres revealed a significant deficit in a functional class of fibres known as muscular (which respond to tissue stretch) and muscular- mucosal afferents (respond to stretch as well as mucosal stroking). These afferents function as low threshold, wide dynamic sensitivity mechanoreceptors, as they encode stimuli across the range, from low to high intensity (Brierley et al. 2004). Interestingly the function of high threshold afferents, widely believed to be critical in pain signalling (Blackshaw & Gebhart, 2002), was preserved. The deficit of this class of wide dynamic sensitivity fibres may underlie the lack of observed visceromotor responses (VMRs) to colorectal distension. Importantly the deficit in the VMR was limited to the colon, as responses to noxious stimulation of the bladder were not altered in ls/ls mice. This work offers a number of important insights, and clearly indicates that endothelin-3 signalling is critically important in development of the spinal innervation of the hindgut, and may in part explain the clinical observation that in Hirschsprung's disease autonomic function outside the enteric nervous system may also be altered (Staiano et al. 1999). However, equally importantly it opens the debate as to what classes of spinal afferents mediate hindgut pain. The loss of the VMR, thought by many to be a pseudoaffective/nocifensive reflex response to painful stimuli (Mayer et al. 2008), suggests that these wide dynamic range afferents may indeed be responsible for visceral pain, and that high threshold afferents (whose function was preserved in the present study) may not play as important a role as previously believed. However, caution should be exercised with this interpretation. Careful examination of visceromotor reflexes in the present study, as well as many others, reveals that the VMR is often activated a distension pressures that lie in the subnoxious range – indeed at pressures that the colon is likely to generate in physiological states. Thus the VMR may represent a continuum, where responses at lower pressure may activate abdominal wall contractions (perhaps to facilitate defecation) while stimuli in the noxious range elicit the more ‘nocifensive’ intense abdominal wall contraction. Indeed even in humans there is a continuum of conscious sensations produced by colorectal distension, ranging from sensation of fullness and need to defecate to discomfort and pain. Perhaps these wide dynamic fibres are responsible for this range of sensations, and perhaps dysfunction of these fibres in conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome or distal colitis can not only lead to pain – but a decreased threshold for the need to defecate. In addition, the tantalizing question is raised that the loss of responses of these extrinsic afferents at the subnoxious range may underlie the defective rectoanal inhibitory reflex seen in Hirschsprung's disease, previously believed to result from a loss of intrinsic enteric neurons. Nonetheless the present study is an excellent example of the use of a genetic defect to probe the function of the afferent innervation of the GI tract. It will remain a challenge for all visceral pain researchers to more clearly define pain behaviours in our animal models, as these models form the basis for developing new drug treatment strategies for common painful conditions of the GI tract such as irritable bowel syndrome.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Physiology→Même sujetGastrointestinal motility and disorders→Travaux en français237 207→