MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2155633619 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.207514

‘Spotting’ afferent pathways of hindgut sensations – role of endothelin‐3 signalling

2011· letter· en· W2155633619 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Beyak

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHindgutAfferentNeuroscienceSignallingEndothelin receptorCommunicationBiologyCell biologyPsychologyChemistryReceptorGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colorectal distension can result in both painful and non-painful sensations. These sensations of pain are carried by afferent nerves innervating the distal gut, but little is known about the specific afferent classes that mediate painful sensations, as well as responses to noxious and non-noxious colorectal stimulation. This is not only of scholarly importance, but also important in the clinical world, as many common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome and colitis, are manifested by pain arising from the distal colon. In a recent issue of The Journal of Physiology, Zagorodnyuk et al. (2011) have used an interesting approach to provide us with further insight into this problem. They utilized a strain of mice deficient in endothelin-3 production, known as the ‘lethal spotted’ (ls/ls) mouse (so named from their unique spotted coat). This mouse is known to lack enteric ganglia in the distal colorectum, and thus serves as a mouse model of Hirschsprung's disease, a rare motility disorder characterized by failure of enteric neuronal development in the bowel – which leads to varying degrees of functional obstruction. The disorder usually presents in childhood, but milder forms may be unrecognized until adulthood (de Lorijn et al. 2007). The authors demonstrated that visceromotor reflexes (abdominal wall contractions in response to colorectal distension – often used as a correlate of visceral pain in rodents) are significantly attenuated in ls/ls mice, and that there is a loss of spinal innervation of the rectum in these animals. Recordings from afferent nerve fibres revealed a significant deficit in a functional class of fibres known as muscular (which respond to tissue stretch) and muscular- mucosal afferents (respond to stretch as well as mucosal stroking). These afferents function as low threshold, wide dynamic sensitivity mechanoreceptors, as they encode stimuli across the range, from low to high intensity (Brierley et al. 2004). Interestingly the function of high threshold afferents, widely believed to be critical in pain signalling (Blackshaw & Gebhart, 2002), was preserved. The deficit of this class of wide dynamic sensitivity fibres may underlie the lack of observed visceromotor responses (VMRs) to colorectal distension. Importantly the deficit in the VMR was limited to the colon, as responses to noxious stimulation of the bladder were not altered in ls/ls mice. This work offers a number of important insights, and clearly indicates that endothelin-3 signalling is critically important in development of the spinal innervation of the hindgut, and may in part explain the clinical observation that in Hirschsprung's disease autonomic function outside the enteric nervous system may also be altered (Staiano et al. 1999). However, equally importantly it opens the debate as to what classes of spinal afferents mediate hindgut pain. The loss of the VMR, thought by many to be a pseudoaffective/nocifensive reflex response to painful stimuli (Mayer et al. 2008), suggests that these wide dynamic range afferents may indeed be responsible for visceral pain, and that high threshold afferents (whose function was preserved in the present study) may not play as important a role as previously believed. However, caution should be exercised with this interpretation. Careful examination of visceromotor reflexes in the present study, as well as many others, reveals that the VMR is often activated a distension pressures that lie in the subnoxious range – indeed at pressures that the colon is likely to generate in physiological states. Thus the VMR may represent a continuum, where responses at lower pressure may activate abdominal wall contractions (perhaps to facilitate defecation) while stimuli in the noxious range elicit the more ‘nocifensive’ intense abdominal wall contraction. Indeed even in humans there is a continuum of conscious sensations produced by colorectal distension, ranging from sensation of fullness and need to defecate to discomfort and pain. Perhaps these wide dynamic fibres are responsible for this range of sensations, and perhaps dysfunction of these fibres in conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome or distal colitis can not only lead to pain – but a decreased threshold for the need to defecate. In addition, the tantalizing question is raised that the loss of responses of these extrinsic afferents at the subnoxious range may underlie the defective rectoanal inhibitory reflex seen in Hirschsprung's disease, previously believed to result from a loss of intrinsic enteric neurons. Nonetheless the present study is an excellent example of the use of a genetic defect to probe the function of the afferent innervation of the GI tract. It will remain a challenge for all visceral pain researchers to more clearly define pain behaviours in our animal models, as these models form the basis for developing new drug treatment strategies for common painful conditions of the GI tract such as irritable bowel syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physiology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→