Obtención de nuevas variedades de triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Triticale is a cereal obtained through the man-made crossing of wheat (gender Triticum) and rye (gender Secale). Its name was formed through the combination of the two progenitors’ gender names. At the beginning, its cultivation had great difficulties as there were few commercial varieties and, furthermore, the farmers ignored its cultivation techniques. The characteristics of this cereal are intermediate between its progenitors’, taking from wheat its high production, harvest index and the high amount of grains by spike; and from rye its stable yield, rusticity, large amount of biomass, cold and drought resistance, adaptation to acid soils, greater amount of lysine in grain and disease resistance. The cereal origin was in Edinburgh. In 1875, Wilson obtained the first crossing between wheat and rye, the result of which was a sterile plant. The first fertile hybrid was obtained in Germany in 1888. During the decades of 1950 and 1960, the University of Manitoba (Canada) and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) started the Triticale research. The objective of this agricultural campaign was the multiplication, on the part of the genetic material, of the experimental lines of Triticale which are currently under study. During the 2016 campaign, 33 materials originally obtained by the CIMMYT were sown: 14 materials were sown in plots of a furrow 5 m long and 19 materials in plots of 30 m long, all of them with 52 cm between furrows, with the objective of obtaining new seeds of high germinating power. Sowing took place on August 12th on the experimental field of the Universidad de Lujan, with a “planet” manual seed drill, fertilized with diammonium phosphate. The delay in the sowing was due to a lack of soil during the month of July. The proposed objective was reached; a new seed with an excellent germinating power was obtained, thus making it necessary to continue with the multiplication of the remaining lines during the next campaign. Phenological data of the materials under study were also obtained, as well as their agronomic characterization.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».