Obtención de nuevas variedades de triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Triticale is a cereal obtained through the man-made crossing of wheat (gender Triticum) and rye (gender Secale). Its name was formed through the combination of the two progenitors’ gender names. At the beginning, its cultivation had great difficulties as there were few commercial varieties and, furthermore, the farmers ignored its cultivation techniques. The characteristics of this cereal are intermediate between its progenitors’, taking from wheat its high production, harvest index and the high amount of grains by spike; and from rye its stable yield, rusticity, large amount of biomass, cold and drought resistance, adaptation to acid soils, greater amount of lysine in grain and disease resistance. The cereal origin was in Edinburgh. In 1875, Wilson obtained the first crossing between wheat and rye, the result of which was a sterile plant. The first fertile hybrid was obtained in Germany in 1888. During the decades of 1950 and 1960, the University of Manitoba (Canada) and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) started the Triticale research. The objective of this agricultural campaign was the multiplication, on the part of the genetic material, of the experimental lines of Triticale which are currently under study. During the 2016 campaign, 33 materials originally obtained by the CIMMYT were sown: 14 materials were sown in plots of a furrow 5 m long and 19 materials in plots of 30 m long, all of them with 52 cm between furrows, with the objective of obtaining new seeds of high germinating power. Sowing took place on August 12th on the experimental field of the Universidad de Lujan, with a “planet” manual seed drill, fertilized with diammonium phosphate. The delay in the sowing was due to a lack of soil during the month of July. The proposed objective was reached; a new seed with an excellent germinating power was obtained, thus making it necessary to continue with the multiplication of the remaining lines during the next campaign. Phenological data of the materials under study were also obtained, as well as their agronomic characterization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".