Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract ICOOPMA10 is the fourth in the ICOOPMA series, an International Conference on Optical, Optoelectronic and Photonic Materials and Applications (also known as The International Conference on Optical and Optoelectronic Properties of Materials and Applications), originally sponsored by Springer, that was held for the first time in Darwin, Australia, in July 2006. The ICOOPMA series arose from a need for such a conference for those researchers who sought a broadly attended international conference that covered a wide range of materials and applications in optics, optoelectronics and photonics. One of the goals is to provide discussions between researchers working on different classes of materials that have similar applications; or have been characterized by similar techniques. The conference had a large number of invited speakers to allow such cross‐fertilization between researchers working on different classes of materials. The conference also seeks papers in interesting or novel applications, or papers that enhance material properties for applications. The International and Local Organizing Committees have the responsibility of ensuring an in‐depth scientific coverage with invited and contributed papers from various countries and in various disciplines; and ensuring an enjoyable scientific program. The Second ICOOPMA was held in London, England, 29 July–3 August, 2007, and had over 250 participants, and five plenary lectures. The Third ICOOPMA was held in Edmonton, Canada, 20–25 July 2008, with nearly 250 participants and had seven plenary talks. TRLabs in Edmonton was responsible for organizing and managing the conference. ICOOPMA10 took place in Budapest from 15 to 20 August 2010 where more than 300 papers were presented. There were three parallel oral sessions from Monday to Thursday as usual, and poster sessions on Monday and on Tuesday to cover all the 300 papers. The program included six plenary lectures (Norbert Kroo, Mark Kuzyk, Hideo Hosono, Thomas Krauss, Michael Petty, Stephan Koch) and 48 invited talks. The current Proceedings represents a collection of papers that have been presented at the conference, and have been fully refereed for inclusion in the proceedings. With the agreement of the ournal’s Editor in Chief and the authors, a selection of papers have been published in physica status solidi (a). The papers in this volume cover not only topics on fundamental concepts, including various optical properties (luminescence being the most popular) of a wide class of materials, e.g. organics, glasses, semiconductors, nanocrystals, quantum wells, wires and dots etc., but also a number of interesting applications from photonics modulators to X‐ray detectors. During the closing address six best poster prizes were given to the authors, mostly to young researchers. Timely publication of conference papers in an easily accessible journal is one of the attractions in presenting one’s latest work at conferences. It allows the work to appear relatively quickly after it has been discussed at the conference. It is also important to ensure that proper refereeing has been done before a paper has been accepted. We specifically allowed paper submissions to continue well after the conference date to ensure that the papers included discussions during the conference. We thank the many referees who have unselfishly dedicated their valuable time in reviewing some hundred‐ten manuscripts and, in many cases, reviewing the revised versions as well. We are grateful to the editorial team at Wiley‐VCH, in particular Stefan Hildebrandt in Berlin, for their help in getting the proceedings out as soon as possible once the refereeing of the papers were complete. ICOOPMA10 chairs are indebted to ASSZISZTENCIA Congress Bureau, Budapest being responsible for managing the conference and to Prof. Safa Kasap for valuable help before, during, and after the conference. The next conference, ICOOPMA12 will be held in Nara, Japan, 3–7 June, 2012 (© 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,358 | 0,194 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».