Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract ICOOPMA10 is the fourth in the ICOOPMA series, an International Conference on Optical, Optoelectronic and Photonic Materials and Applications (also known as The International Conference on Optical and Optoelectronic Properties of Materials and Applications), originally sponsored by Springer, that was held for the first time in Darwin, Australia, in July 2006. The ICOOPMA series arose from a need for such a conference for those researchers who sought a broadly attended international conference that covered a wide range of materials and applications in optics, optoelectronics and photonics. One of the goals is to provide discussions between researchers working on different classes of materials that have similar applications; or have been characterized by similar techniques. The conference had a large number of invited speakers to allow such cross‐fertilization between researchers working on different classes of materials. The conference also seeks papers in interesting or novel applications, or papers that enhance material properties for applications. The International and Local Organizing Committees have the responsibility of ensuring an in‐depth scientific coverage with invited and contributed papers from various countries and in various disciplines; and ensuring an enjoyable scientific program. The Second ICOOPMA was held in London, England, 29 July–3 August, 2007, and had over 250 participants, and five plenary lectures. The Third ICOOPMA was held in Edmonton, Canada, 20–25 July 2008, with nearly 250 participants and had seven plenary talks. TRLabs in Edmonton was responsible for organizing and managing the conference. ICOOPMA10 took place in Budapest from 15 to 20 August 2010 where more than 300 papers were presented. There were three parallel oral sessions from Monday to Thursday as usual, and poster sessions on Monday and on Tuesday to cover all the 300 papers. The program included six plenary lectures (Norbert Kroo, Mark Kuzyk, Hideo Hosono, Thomas Krauss, Michael Petty, Stephan Koch) and 48 invited talks. The current Proceedings represents a collection of papers that have been presented at the conference, and have been fully refereed for inclusion in the proceedings. With the agreement of the ournal’s Editor in Chief and the authors, a selection of papers have been published in physica status solidi (a) . The papers in this volume cover not only topics on fundamental concepts, including various optical properties (luminescence being the most popular) of a wide class of materials, e.g. organics, glasses, semiconductors, nanocrystals, quantum wells, wires and dots etc., but also a number of interesting applications from photonics modulators to X‐ray detectors. During the closing address six best poster prizes were given to the authors, mostly to young researchers. Timely publication of conference papers in an easily accessible journal is one of the attractions in presenting one’s latest work at conferences. It allows the work to appear relatively quickly after it has been discussed at the conference. It is also important to ensure that proper refereeing has been done before a paper has been accepted. We specifically allowed paper submissions to continue well after the conference date to ensure that the papers included discussions during the conference. We thank the many referees who have unselfishly dedicated their valuable time in reviewing some hundred‐ten manuscripts and, in many cases, reviewing the revised versions as well. We are grateful to the editorial team at Wiley‐VCH, in particular Stefan Hildebrandt in Berlin, for their help in getting the proceedings out as soon as possible once the refereeing of the papers were complete. ICOOPMA10 chairs are indebted to ASSZISZTENCIA Congress Bureau, Budapest being responsible for managing the conference and to Prof. Safa Kasap for valuable help before, during, and after the conference. The next conference, ICOOPMA12 will be held in Nara, Japan, 3–7 June, 2012 (© 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".