MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2162722928 · doi:10.1177/014107680509800616

Multiple Sclerosis: The History of a Disease

2005· article· en· W2162722928 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Medicine Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMultiple sclerosisData scienceComputer scienceDiseaseMedicineWorld Wide WebPathologyImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

'It would be nice if a physician from London, one of these days, were to gallop up hotspur, tether his horse to the gatepost and dash in waving a reprieve—the discovery of a cure!' Wilhelm Nero Pilate Barbellion, the pen name of Bruce Frederick Cummings, described his life with a chronic neurological illness in his Journal of a Disappointed Man. He died age 30 years, in 1919. Early features were recurrent numbness and weakness in the limbs, vertigo, depression, decreased sight in one eye, facial numbness and weakness in the right arm. Medications included arsenic and strychnine and homeopathic remedies. Sir Henry Head, the neurologist, asked suspiciously if he had ever been with women, and then ordered two months' complete rest in the country. He 'chased me around his consulting room with a drumstick tapping my tendons and cunningly working my reflexes'. The diagnosis was concealed from Cummings, who sought a military service examination to force a disqualification diagnosis of disseminated sclerosis. T Jock Murray is Professor of Medical Humanities and Director of the MS Program at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. Multiple Sclerosis: The History of a Disease shows depth and breadth of understanding and a passion for the subject; moreover, the style of presentation makes it an easy and addictive read, enhanced by well annotated illustrations. In describing the history of multiple sclerosis Murray also provides a history of neurology and the associated philosophy of science. Possibly the earliest documentation of multiple sclerosis is the case of Lidwina the Virgin, who lived in Schiedam, Holland. In 1395, age 16 years, Lidwina developed an acute illness and subsequently fell while skating on a frozen canal. Later symptoms included blindness in one eye, weakness and pain. She died in 1433. After canonization she became the patron saint of both figure skating and sickness. While some commentators have considered there to be sufficient evidence for a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, Murray in his gentle way points to elements of marked religiosity, mysticism, histrionic behaviour, and even self-mutilation. The features of multiple sclerosis were first well defined by Jean-Martin Charcot, neurologist at the Hopital de Salpetriere in 1868, as 'la sclerose en plaques'. In particular he made the distinction between the tremor of paralysis agitans (later called Parkinson's disease) and that of multiple sclerosis. The three most reliable indicators of multiple sclerosis—intention tremor, nystagmus, and scanning speech—became known as Charcot's triad. Dr Murray educates the reader painlessly on the aetiology and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis while presenting the history of the disease. Thus we proceed through clinical description and classification, neuropathology, neurophysiology, immunology, and imaging, with a hint of genetics. The continuing critical theme is neuropathology. From the clinician's point of view the development of magnetic resonance imaging has been key to allowing more precise diagnosis as well as surrogate markers for clinical trials. Until very recently there has been no effective treatment, although a wide range of treatments have been used. It is surprising to see that the current use of steroids for acute relapses is quite recent (high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone replacing corticotropin in the early 1980s, following the pattern of usage by rheumatologists), with the first major controlled trial to demonstrate efficacy of the regimen published in 1987. Interferons, discovered in the 1950s, were initially promoted as a treatment for cancer. In 1977 Lawrence Jacobs of Buffalo, NY, was offered a returned supply of interferon (produced from the foreskin of recently circumcized infants). He was initially interested in using this for the rapidly progressive and fatal illness amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (motor neuron disease) but chose to study multiple sclerosis since there were more patients available. The Food and Drug Administration approved the first interferon for treatment of multiple sclerosis in 1993, with other interferons and copolymer following. The use of the interferons remains controversial, with the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in the UK being equivocal in its advice. Altogether this is a fascinating and monumental work, a pleasure to read. The contents should be accessible to a wide audience, and provide an excellent understanding of multiple sclerosis, the history of neurology, and the philosophy of science. In his final words Dr Murray offers a conclusion that may be a cliche but reflects the content of the work: 'For every breakthrough identified with an individual, there are her or his many colleagues, coworkers, staff and assistants— the person who developed the technological step that allowed the research to go forward, the statistician who showed that the work was relevant, the secretarial and administrative staff who kept the absent-minded professors free to pursue their scientific goals, and especially their colleagues, who provided a support system and added ideas and information that allowed them to go forward.' This is the nature and lesson of history.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,692
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,167 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle