MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162722928 · doi:10.1177/014107680509800616

Multiple Sclerosis: The History of a Disease

2005· article· en· W2162722928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard W. Orrell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisData scienceComputer scienceDiseaseMedicineWorld Wide WebPathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple Sclerosis: The History of a DiseaseT Jock Murray 580pp Price $29.95 ISBN 1-888799-80-3 (p/b) New York: Demos Medical Publishing 'It would be nice if a physician from London, one of these days, were to gallop up hotspur, tether his horse to the gatepost and dash in waving a reprieve-the discovery of a cure!' Wilhelm Nero Pilate Barbellion, the pen name of Bruce Frederick Cummings, described his life with a chronic neurological illness in his Journal of a Disappointed Man.He died age 30 years, in 1919.Early features were recurrent numbness and weakness in the limbs, vertigo, depression, decreased sight in one eye, facial numbness and weakness in the right arm.Medications included arsenic and strychnine and homeopathic remedies.Sir Henry Head, the neurologist, asked suspiciously if he had ever been with women, and then ordered two months' complete rest in the country.He 'chased me around his consulting room with a drumstick tapping my tendons and cunningly working my reflexes'.The diagnosis was concealed from Cummings, who sought a military service examination to force a disqualification diagnosis of disseminated sclerosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Society of MedicineSame topicHistory of Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207