Persistent Increases in Cardiac Troponin Concentrations As Measured with High-Sensitivity Assays after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor: We read with interest the report by Koenig et al. (1) showing the value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT)1 assays for predicting long-term cardiovascular events in patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or coronary artery bypass grafting. Although studies have demonstrated long-term cardiovascular events with measurements of hs-cTnI or hs-cTnT in patients who present with symptoms suggestive of ACS (2, 3), Koenig et al. found a relationship with hs-cTnT concentrations after patients had been discharged from a cardiac rehabilitation program (mean time to discharge and hs-cTnT measurement was 43 days from the index event) (1). hs-cTnT concentrations >3 ng/L (limit of blank) remained detectable in 84% of patients and were ≥14 ng/L (99th percentile) in 37.1% of the patients. These findings raise important questions about how gradually hs-cTnT concentrations decrease in the absence of recurrent ACS and have implications regarding the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for diagnosing subsequent events in patients who are stable after an ACS. To address these questions, we conducted a prospective observational study to assess whether cardiac troponin concentrations normalize by 30 days after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). After obtaining ethics approval, we recruited a convenience sample of Hamilton General Hospital patients who consented to return 30 days after their first AMI (index event) to provide a follow-up sample (plasma from EDTA-anticoagulated blood) for cTnT analyses (Roche fourth-generation assay, used clinically). Samples were frozen at −80 °C and were subsequently thawed for the first time for hs-cTnT analysis (Roche Diagnostics E Modular Analytics analyzer; CV, 2.4% at 30 ng/L) and thawed a second time for the hs-cTnI assay (Abbott Diagnostics precommercial prototype assay, ARCHITECT i1000SR analyzer; CV, 6.1% at 21 ng/L). We used the following thresholds, which were obtained from the literature for cTnT and from the manufacturer for hs-cTnI, as evidence of a persistent abnormal increase: cTnT >10 ng/L, hs-cTnT 99th percentiles [≥14 ng/L (overall), ≥9 ng/L (women), and ≥16 ng/L (men)], and hs-cTnI 99th percentiles [≥26 ng/L (overall), ≥16 ng/L (women), and ≥34 ng/L (men)]. We collected samples from 46 patients, 38 with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 8 non-STEMI patients. Two of the patients had a recurrent myocardial infarction during the 30-day follow-up. We assessed the remaining 44 patients [38 men and 6 women; mean (SD) age, 60 (12) years] who had remained event free. Similar to the results of Koenig et al., we found that 80% of the patients had hs-cTnT values ≥3 ng/L and 27% had hs-cTnT values ≥14 ng/L by 30 days after their AMI (Fig. 1). In addition, 84% of the patients had a detectable hs-cTnI concentration (≥1.3 ng/L, limit of blank). Persistent increases, however, were not as common for cTnT values >10 ng/L (2% of patients) or for hs-cTnI values greater than the overall 99th percentile (7% of patients had values ≥26 ng/L) by 30 days after an AMI. The use of sex-specific 99th percentile cutoffs further reduced the overall prevalence of persistent hs-cTnT increases (20% of patients) and hs-cTnI (2% of patients). When overall or sex-specific 99th percentile cutoffs were used, the hs-cTnI assay classified participants differently than the hs-cTnT assay (P = 0.007, and P = 0.011, respectively, by the McNemar test). The probabilities of persistent increases in hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI were not affected by sex (male, female), age (<60 years, ≥60 years), or type of index event (STEMI, non-STEMI) (P > 0.10, χ2 test). There is evidence that increases in hs-cTnT ≥99th percentile may last up to 7 weeks after an ACS. Another recent cohort study showed that a similar proportion of patients (31.3%) had persistent hs-cTnT increases ≥14 ng/L at 7 weeks after an ACS (4). The risk of a cardiovascular event in patients who had a persistent hs-cTnT increase was >3-fold higher than in patients whose hs-cTnT values normalized by 7 weeks after an ACS (4). It remains unclear, however, how long hs-cTnT increases persist beyond 7 weeks or whether this effect is observed with the hs-cTnI assays, because it appears that cTnI concentrations may fall below the 99th percentile cutoffs during the healing phase (approximately 5 to 6 weeks) after an AMI (5). In conclusion, although there may be prognostic value for cardiac troponin concentrations measured by high-sensitivity assays during the convalescence phase of stable patients after an ACS, our data suggest that diagnosis of subsequent events (reinfarction) is not possible with a single hs-cTnT measurement. A substantial number of patients will have increased hs-cTnT concentrations for at least 30 days after an AMI without showing increases with either the fourth-generation cTnT assay or the hs-cTnI assay with the manufacturer's 99th percentile cutoffs. Observations of persistent increases in cardiac troponin with high-sensitivity assays after an AMI are consistent with the new guidelines from the Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (5), which recommend serial measurements and possibly sex-specific cutoffs to distinguish chronic from acute increases (i.e., reinfarction). Limitations of our study include the short 30-day observation period and the limited laboratory and imaging data before and after ACS; thus, one cannot distinguish between increases due to the slow process of “healing” and those caused by persistent left ventricular dysfunction. Larger and longer studies are needed to determine when hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT concentrations normalize across different patient subgroups after ACS, and during and after the healing phase. high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (assay) acute coronary syndrome high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (assay) acute myocardial infarction ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,025 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».