MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164074843 · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.196071

Persistent Increases in Cardiac Troponin Concentrations As Measured with High-Sensitivity Assays after Acute Myocardial Infarction

2012· letter· en· W2164074843 on OpenAlexaff
John L. Sievenpiper, Andrew Worster, Sonya Brons, Shamir R. Mehta, Peter A. Kavsak

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine ProgramHamilton Health SciencesPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversitySt. Michael's Hospital
FundersRoche
KeywordsMyocardial infarctionCardiologyMedicineInternal medicineTroponin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: We read with interest the report by Koenig et al. (1) showing the value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT)1 assays for predicting long-term cardiovascular events in patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or coronary artery bypass grafting. Although studies have demonstrated long-term cardiovascular events with measurements of hs-cTnI or hs-cTnT in patients who present with symptoms suggestive of ACS (2, 3), Koenig et al. found a relationship with hs-cTnT concentrations after patients had been discharged from a cardiac rehabilitation program (mean time to discharge and hs-cTnT measurement was 43 days from the index event) (1). hs-cTnT concentrations >3 ng/L (limit of blank) remained detectable in 84% of patients and were ≥14 ng/L (99th percentile) in 37.1% of the patients. These findings raise important questions about how gradually hs-cTnT concentrations decrease in the absence of recurrent ACS and have implications regarding the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for diagnosing subsequent events in patients who are stable after an ACS. To address these questions, we conducted a prospective observational study to assess whether cardiac troponin concentrations normalize by 30 days after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). After obtaining ethics approval, we recruited a convenience sample of Hamilton General Hospital patients who consented to return 30 days after their first AMI (index event) to provide a follow-up sample (plasma from EDTA-anticoagulated blood) for cTnT analyses (Roche fourth-generation assay, used clinically). Samples were frozen at −80 °C and were subsequently thawed for the first time for hs-cTnT analysis (Roche Diagnostics E Modular Analytics analyzer; CV, 2.4% at 30 ng/L) and thawed a second time for the hs-cTnI assay (Abbott Diagnostics precommercial prototype assay, ARCHITECT i1000SR analyzer; CV, 6.1% at 21 ng/L). We used the following thresholds, which were obtained from the literature for cTnT and from the manufacturer for hs-cTnI, as evidence of a persistent abnormal increase: cTnT >10 ng/L, hs-cTnT 99th percentiles [≥14 ng/L (overall), ≥9 ng/L (women), and ≥16 ng/L (men)], and hs-cTnI 99th percentiles [≥26 ng/L (overall), ≥16 ng/L (women), and ≥34 ng/L (men)]. We collected samples from 46 patients, 38 with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 8 non-STEMI patients. Two of the patients had a recurrent myocardial infarction during the 30-day follow-up. We assessed the remaining 44 patients [38 men and 6 women; mean (SD) age, 60 (12) years] who had remained event free. Similar to the results of Koenig et al., we found that 80% of the patients had hs-cTnT values ≥3 ng/L and 27% had hs-cTnT values ≥14 ng/L by 30 days after their AMI (Fig. 1). In addition, 84% of the patients had a detectable hs-cTnI concentration (≥1.3 ng/L, limit of blank). Persistent increases, however, were not as common for cTnT values >10 ng/L (2% of patients) or for hs-cTnI values greater than the overall 99th percentile (7% of patients had values ≥26 ng/L) by 30 days after an AMI. The use of sex-specific 99th percentile cutoffs further reduced the overall prevalence of persistent hs-cTnT increases (20% of patients) and hs-cTnI (2% of patients). When overall or sex-specific 99th percentile cutoffs were used, the hs-cTnI assay classified participants differently than the hs-cTnT assay (P = 0.007, and P = 0.011, respectively, by the McNemar test). The probabilities of persistent increases in hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI were not affected by sex (male, female), age (<60 years, ≥60 years), or type of index event (STEMI, non-STEMI) (P > 0.10, χ2 test). There is evidence that increases in hs-cTnT ≥99th percentile may last up to 7 weeks after an ACS. Another recent cohort study showed that a similar proportion of patients (31.3%) had persistent hs-cTnT increases ≥14 ng/L at 7 weeks after an ACS (4). The risk of a cardiovascular event in patients who had a persistent hs-cTnT increase was >3-fold higher than in patients whose hs-cTnT values normalized by 7 weeks after an ACS (4). It remains unclear, however, how long hs-cTnT increases persist beyond 7 weeks or whether this effect is observed with the hs-cTnI assays, because it appears that cTnI concentrations may fall below the 99th percentile cutoffs during the healing phase (approximately 5 to 6 weeks) after an AMI (5). In conclusion, although there may be prognostic value for cardiac troponin concentrations measured by high-sensitivity assays during the convalescence phase of stable patients after an ACS, our data suggest that diagnosis of subsequent events (reinfarction) is not possible with a single hs-cTnT measurement. A substantial number of patients will have increased hs-cTnT concentrations for at least 30 days after an AMI without showing increases with either the fourth-generation cTnT assay or the hs-cTnI assay with the manufacturer's 99th percentile cutoffs. Observations of persistent increases in cardiac troponin with high-sensitivity assays after an AMI are consistent with the new guidelines from the Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (5), which recommend serial measurements and possibly sex-specific cutoffs to distinguish chronic from acute increases (i.e., reinfarction). Limitations of our study include the short 30-day observation period and the limited laboratory and imaging data before and after ACS; thus, one cannot distinguish between increases due to the slow process of “healing” and those caused by persistent left ventricular dysfunction. Larger and longer studies are needed to determine when hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT concentrations normalize across different patient subgroups after ACS, and during and after the healing phase. high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (assay) acute coronary syndrome high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (assay) acute myocardial infarction ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0110.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207