MétaCan
← tous les travaux

A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how

2010· article· en· 3 439 citations· W2170182466 sur OpenAlex· 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.
Organisme subventionnaire canadienUn organisme canadien l'a financé. Le travail peut ne porter aucune affiliation canadienne.

Résumé

Pilot studies for phase III trials - which are comparative randomized trials designed to provide preliminary evidence on the clinical efficacy of a drug or intervention - are routinely performed in many clinical areas. Also commonly know as "feasibility" or "vanguard" studies, they are designed to assess the safety of treatment or interventions; to assess recruitment potential; to assess the feasibility of international collaboration or coordination for multicentre trials; to increase clinical experience with the study medication or intervention for the phase III trials. They are the best way to assess feasibility of a large, expensive full-scale study, and in fact are an almost essential pre-requisite. Conducting a pilot prior to the main study can enhance the likelihood of success of the main study and potentially help to avoid doomed main studies. The objective of this paper is to provide a detailed examination of the key aspects of pilot studies for phase III trials including: 1) the general reasons for conducting a pilot study; 2) the relationships between pilot studies, proof-of-concept studies, and adaptive designs; 3) the challenges of and misconceptions about pilot studies; 4) the criteria for evaluating the success of a pilot study; 5) frequently asked questions about pilot studies; 7) some ethical aspects related to pilot studies; and 8) some suggestions on how to report the results of pilot investigations using the CONSORT format.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

La notice

Revue
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Thématique
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Domaine
Decision Sciences
Établissements canadiens
GlaxoSmithKline (Canada)St. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnaires
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clés
Clinical trialMedicinePilot trialPsychological interventionIntervention (counseling)Research designClinical study designMedical physicsRandomized controlled trialNursingSurgery
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui