Depositional facies framework, evolution, and reservoir architecture of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research Article| September 01, 2009 Depositional facies framework, evolution, and reservoir architecture of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia Jack Wendte; Jack Wendte Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street, NW Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, jwendte@NRCan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Alan Byrnes; Alan Byrnes 1 Kansas Geological Survey, 1930 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047, alan.byrnes@chk.com 1Current affiliation: Chesapeake Energy Corporation, 6100 N. Western Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK, 73118 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Sargent; David Sargent Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, dsargent@NRCan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Ihsan Al-Aasm Ihsan Al-Aasm Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, alaasm@uwindsor.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jack Wendte Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street, NW Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, jwendte@NRCan.gc.ca Alan Byrnes 1 Kansas Geological Survey, 1930 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047, alan.byrnes@chk.com David Sargent Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, dsargent@NRCan.gc.ca Ihsan Al-Aasm Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, alaasm@uwindsor.ca 1Current affiliation: Chesapeake Energy Corporation, 6100 N. Western Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK, 73118 Publisher: Canadian Energy Geoscience Association Received: 29 Nov 2008 Accepted: 17 Jun 2009 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2009) 57 (3): 209–250. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.57.3.209 Article history Received: 29 Nov 2008 Accepted: 17 Jun 2009 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Jack Wendte, Alan Byrnes, David Sargent, Ihsan Al-Aasm; Depositional facies framework, evolution, and reservoir architecture of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2009;; 57 (3): 209–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.57.3.209 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The Jean Marie Member of the Upper Devonian Redknife Formation is a gas-saturated, dominantly limestone unit with minor dolostone that occurs throughout a widespread area in the subsurface of northwestern Alberta, northeastern British Columbia, and the southern Northwest Territories. In British Columbia this unit is estimated to most likely contain approximately 10 TCF of gas in place and 6.5 TCF of marketable gas.This paper discusses the depositional facies framework, evolution, and reservoir architecture of the Jean Marie Member in the July Lake area of extreme northeastern British Columbia, based on the description and investigation of 18 cores from vertical wells drilled in the early 1990s. The Jean Marie in these wells varies from 11.7 to 21.2 m thick and consists of the upper portion of one Transgressive-Regressive (T-R) cycle and two other complete, overlying T-R cycles. The basal 3 to 4 m of the Jean Marie consists of brachiopod-bearing lime wackestones that were deposited on an areally extensive carbonate ramp. These carbonates were deposited during the regional progradation of limestones out over deeper-water shales of the underlying Fort Simpson Formation. The base of the second T-R cycle marks the change from regional progradation to the start of a more aggradational phase of sedimentation. The second T-R cycle attains a maximum cumulative thickness of 16.5 m and consists of coalescing patch reef deposits. The patch reefs are speculatively interpreted to be only 50 to 100 m across to begin with, but expanded in certain directions by lateral growth during progradation. The uppermost T-R cycle consists of either a continuation of these patch reef facies, the nucleation of Amphipora shoals on underlying T-R cycle 2 patch reefs or intervening, detrital stromatoporoid and coral-bearing foreslope deposits and deeper-water branching coral-bearing limestones. Unlike the second T-R cycle, foreslope facies of T-R cycle 3 consist of more fragmental carbonates with grain-support (pellet packstone) matrices. Progradation during this interval caused further coalescence of patch reefs and Amphipora shoals, and the appreciable infilling of low-lying areas between these reefs and shoals. This resulted in lower depositional relief at the top rather than at the base of this T-R cycle. Preferential partial dolomitization and dissolution of these deposits produced permeable strata between the patch reefs and/or Amphipora shoals.Reservoir facies consist of two main types. Firstly, and most importantly, are lime framestones that make up the patch reefs of the second and third T-R cycles, consisting of in situ platy stromatoporoids and pendent Renalcis that grew downward into shelter cavities beneath the platy stromatoporoids. Porosity occurs mainly in molds or partial molds of Renalcis that are connected by cm-scale, non-planar fractures. Secondly are somewhat less fractured limestones and partially dolomitized limestones of the detrital stromatoporoid-coral foreslope facies that occur as prograding aprons around the patch reefs in the upper T-R cycle. Pores in this facies are predominantly micropores or coalesced micropores, of dissolution origin. The degree of calcite dissolution is generally greater in samples with a higher matrix replacement dolomite content. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».