Depositional facies framework, evolution, and reservoir architecture of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| September 01, 2009 Depositional facies framework, evolution, and reservoir architecture of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia Jack Wendte; Jack Wendte Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street, NW Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, jwendte@NRCan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Alan Byrnes; Alan Byrnes 1 Kansas Geological Survey, 1930 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047, alan.byrnes@chk.com 1Current affiliation: Chesapeake Energy Corporation, 6100 N. Western Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK, 73118 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Sargent; David Sargent Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, dsargent@NRCan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Ihsan Al-Aasm Ihsan Al-Aasm Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, alaasm@uwindsor.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jack Wendte Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street, NW Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, jwendte@NRCan.gc.ca Alan Byrnes 1 Kansas Geological Survey, 1930 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047, alan.byrnes@chk.com David Sargent Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, dsargent@NRCan.gc.ca Ihsan Al-Aasm Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, alaasm@uwindsor.ca 1Current affiliation: Chesapeake Energy Corporation, 6100 N. Western Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK, 73118 Publisher: Canadian Energy Geoscience Association Received: 29 Nov 2008 Accepted: 17 Jun 2009 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2009) 57 (3): 209–250. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.57.3.209 Article history Received: 29 Nov 2008 Accepted: 17 Jun 2009 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Jack Wendte, Alan Byrnes, David Sargent, Ihsan Al-Aasm; Depositional facies framework, evolution, and reservoir architecture of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2009;; 57 (3): 209–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.57.3.209 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The Jean Marie Member of the Upper Devonian Redknife Formation is a gas-saturated, dominantly limestone unit with minor dolostone that occurs throughout a widespread area in the subsurface of northwestern Alberta, northeastern British Columbia, and the southern Northwest Territories. In British Columbia this unit is estimated to most likely contain approximately 10 TCF of gas in place and 6.5 TCF of marketable gas.This paper discusses the depositional facies framework, evolution, and reservoir architecture of the Jean Marie Member in the July Lake area of extreme northeastern British Columbia, based on the description and investigation of 18 cores from vertical wells drilled in the early 1990s. The Jean Marie in these wells varies from 11.7 to 21.2 m thick and consists of the upper portion of one Transgressive-Regressive (T-R) cycle and two other complete, overlying T-R cycles. The basal 3 to 4 m of the Jean Marie consists of brachiopod-bearing lime wackestones that were deposited on an areally extensive carbonate ramp. These carbonates were deposited during the regional progradation of limestones out over deeper-water shales of the underlying Fort Simpson Formation. The base of the second T-R cycle marks the change from regional progradation to the start of a more aggradational phase of sedimentation. The second T-R cycle attains a maximum cumulative thickness of 16.5 m and consists of coalescing patch reef deposits. The patch reefs are speculatively interpreted to be only 50 to 100 m across to begin with, but expanded in certain directions by lateral growth during progradation. The uppermost T-R cycle consists of either a continuation of these patch reef facies, the nucleation of Amphipora shoals on underlying T-R cycle 2 patch reefs or intervening, detrital stromatoporoid and coral-bearing foreslope deposits and deeper-water branching coral-bearing limestones. Unlike the second T-R cycle, foreslope facies of T-R cycle 3 consist of more fragmental carbonates with grain-support (pellet packstone) matrices. Progradation during this interval caused further coalescence of patch reefs and Amphipora shoals, and the appreciable infilling of low-lying areas between these reefs and shoals. This resulted in lower depositional relief at the top rather than at the base of this T-R cycle. Preferential partial dolomitization and dissolution of these deposits produced permeable strata between the patch reefs and/or Amphipora shoals.Reservoir facies consist of two main types. Firstly, and most importantly, are lime framestones that make up the patch reefs of the second and third T-R cycles, consisting of in situ platy stromatoporoids and pendent Renalcis that grew downward into shelter cavities beneath the platy stromatoporoids. Porosity occurs mainly in molds or partial molds of Renalcis that are connected by cm-scale, non-planar fractures. Secondly are somewhat less fractured limestones and partially dolomitized limestones of the detrital stromatoporoid-coral foreslope facies that occur as prograding aprons around the patch reefs in the upper T-R cycle. Pores in this facies are predominantly micropores or coalesced micropores, of dissolution origin. The degree of calcite dissolution is generally greater in samples with a higher matrix replacement dolomite content. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".