MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W218273434 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.714.714

Primary Analysis Results from an Open-Label Phase II Study of INCB039110, a Selective JAK1 Inhibitor, in Patients with Myelofibrosis

2014· article· en· W218273434 sur OpenAlexaff
John Mascarenhas, Moshe Talpaz, Vikas Gupta, Lynda Foltz, Michael R. Savona, Ron Paquette, Robert Turner, Paul Coughlin, Elliott F. Winton, Deborah Hunter, Albert Assad, Jason Clark, Peter O'Neill, Ronald Hoffman, Srđan Verstovšek

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensAlberta Cancer FoundationUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Paul's HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMyelofibrosisMedicineInternal medicineRuxolitinibClinical endpointPolycythemia veraGastroenterologyConstitutional symptomsEssential thrombocythemiaAnemiaBone painPhases of clinical researchExtramedullary hematopoiesisAbdominal painBone marrowClinical trialDiseaseHaematopoiesis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Janus kinases (JAKs), including JAK1 and JAK2, mediate the signaling of cytokines and growth factors implicated in the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis (MF). Suppression of JAK2 leads to cytopenias due to its involvement in the signaling pathways of thrombopoietin and erythropoietin. Purpose: The objective of this ongoing study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of INCB039110, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in patients with MF with the goal of improving MF-related symptoms with less myelosuppression than seen with JAK1/JAK2 inhibition. Here, we report the 12- and 24-week efficacy and safety of INCB039110 in a phase II trial. Methods: Adults with intermediate-1 or higher (per Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]) primary MF (PMF), post–polycythemia vera MF (PPV-MF), or post–essential thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF) were eligible regardless of JAK2V617F mutation status. A platelet count of ≥ 50 × 109/L, hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL (transfusions permitted), and a palpable spleen or prior splenectomy were required. Patients assessed the severity of 19 disease-related symptoms daily using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v3.0 electronic diary. Spleen volume (SV) was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography at baseline, week 12, and week 24. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in total symptom score (TSS, consisting of the sum of 6 individual symptom scores: night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under left ribs, early satiety, and bone/muscle pain) at week 12. Other endpoints included the proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in TSS at week 24, percentage change from baseline in TSS at week 12 and 24, percentage change from baseline in SV at week 12 and 24, and safety. The study used a Simon 2-stage design to assess 3 separate dose cohorts (100 mg twice daily [BID], 200 mg BID, and 600 mg once daily [QD]). A dose cohort could be expanded if ≥ 3 of the first 10 patients met the primary endpoint (intent-to-treat method). Results: Enrollment is complete and 87 patients have been treated with INCB039110: 10 in the 100 mg BID, 45 in the 200 mg BID, and 32 in the 600 mg QD groups; 10, 42, and 31 patients, respectively, were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The 200 mg BID and 600 mg QD cohorts met criteria for expansion. Enrolled patients (mean age, 64 years) had PMF (55%), PPV-MF (26%), or PET-MF (18%), and most had intermediate-1 (37%) or intermediate-2 (47%) risk by DIPSS. Mean SV at baseline was 2442.7 cm3, mean hemoglobin was 10.2 g/dL, and mean platelet count was 246.7 × 109/L. Reductions in TSS were similar between the 200 mg BID and 600 mg QD groups, and largely maintained through week 24 (Table). Modest reductions in spleen volume were attained in the 200 mg BID and 600 mg QD groups. TableINCB039110 Dose100 mg BID200 mg BID600 mg QD Patients with ≥ 50% improvement in TSS,* n/N (%)Week 122/10 (20)15/42 (36)10/31 (32)Week 242/10 (20)12/42 (29)11/31 (35) Median change from baseline in TSS,† %Week 12−28.5−45.8−37.2Week 24−57.2−48.6−46.7Median change in SV,† %Week 12−0.5−14.1−14.5Week 24−31.1−17.4−17.1 * Patients who discontinued prior to the week 12 or 24 visit were considered nonresponders at that time point. † Only patients with baseline and week 12 or 24 data were included. Negative change = improvement. Mean platelet count is shown in Figure 1. Mean hemoglobin levels in patients who entered the study without transfusion requirements and did not receive post-baseline blood transfusions are shown in Figure 2. In these patients, the mean percent change from baseline in hemoglobin at week 24 increased by 5.6% in the 200 mg BID group and 8.6% in the 600 mg QD group. The most common nonhematologic adverse events (occurring in > 15% of enrolled patients overall regardless of causality) were fatigue (29%), nausea (21%), upper respiratory tract infection (18%), constipation (17%), diarrhea (17%), and cough (16%); most of these events were grade 1 or 2 and did not appear to be dose dependent. New or worsening grade 3 or 4 anemia occurred in 33% and 0% of patients, respectively, and thrombocytopenia in 24% and 5% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with MF treated with the JAK1 inhibitor INCB039110 (200 mg BID or 600 mg QD) continued to show meaningful improvements in MF-related symptoms and modest decreases in spleen size, while preserving mean hemoglobin levels over time through week 24. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Talpaz:ARIAD, BMS, Sanofi. Incyte, Pfizer: Research Funding. Gupta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Foltz:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Savona:Karyopharm: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead : Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene : Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paquette:Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Coughlin:Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eastern Health: Employment. Winton:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hunter:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Assad:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Clark:Incyte Corporation: Employment. O'Neill:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Hoffman:All Cells LLC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207