MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2183238110 · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.115115

Lake Wabamun : a review of scientific studies and environmental impacts /

2004· review· en· W2183238110 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
David W. Schindler

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesTrent UniversityUniversity of Lethbridge
Mots-clésGeographyEnvironmental planningEnvironmental ethicsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The following recommendations are in roughly descending order of importance: The parties who would implement these recommendations are not identified in this report since the Panel assumes that responsibility for implementation would be allocated according to a combination of current government agency mandates and activities, industry permit requirements, and input from citizen or scientific advisory groups (see final recommendation). FisheriesDespite heavy recreational activity and industrial use.Lake Wabamun is in moderately good condition.The most serious problem is with the fish community.As a result of commercial fishing, sport overfishing, and destruction of fish habitat, walleye have disappeared from the lake.Few pike survive long enough to reach reproductive age.Lake whitefish have not successfully reproduced for several years. We recommend that commercial fishing be eliminated altogether, and that sport fishing be restricted to catch and release until populations recover to more normal age structures.Past efforts to re-introduce walleye have been unsuccessful.High hooking mortality from catch and release angling is probably responsible. We recommend that any future attempts to reintroduce walleye be accompanied by total closure to angling of areas of the lake where walleye congregate, until several age classes are established.While great efforts have been made to reduce industry-related fish mortalities, they are still significant and in some cases unpredictable in occurrence.They are, however less important than mortalities caused by angling or commercial fishing. We recommend continued vigilance to prevent and correct fish mortalities.These mortalities should also be taken into account in management and allocation of the fisheries resource.Weed harvesting is a relatively insignificant source of direct fish mortality, but it causes a significant loss of fish habitat.Modifications of shoreline properties by cottagers have also resulted in significant loss of fish habitat. We recommend that weed harvesting be discontinued, and that other prohibited destruction of fish habitat, including weedbeds, be monitored and enforced according to the Canada Fisheries Act.Dredgings Disinfection By-products and Thermal Effluents We found that these three topics required no action, for a variety of reasons.Dredging does not appear to be likely to provide significant benefits to the lake.It would require lengthy and thorough investigations to ensure that fish habitat was not destroyed. We do not recommend dredging at this time.Disinfection by-product concentrations for the Wabamun Lake Water Treatment Plant are low, and below thresholds where effects on human or animal health would be expected.Although little is know about effects on aquatic life, concentrations in the discharge are low and vastly diluted by the volume of the lake. Disinfection by-products are not of concern.The thermal effluent from the Wabamun Power Plant will cease as the Plant is decommissioned.Appropriate measures have been taken to mitigate the effects of the thermal effluents.However, the loss of the open water region of the lake in winter after the thermal effluent ceases may result in possible oxygen depletion under ice. We recommend that follow-up studies should investigate the possibility that oxygen depletion under winter ice might occur after heated effluents cease. Additional RecommendationsMany of the past studies of Wabamun Lake have been undertaken by Alberta Environment staff or by consultants hired by TransAlta in response to public perception.Some of the perceptions did not justify scientific study, and some other issues were simply not amenable to scientific investigation.Examples include disinfection by-products and dredging.At present, there are several stakeholder groups that independently pressure Alberta Environment or TransAlta with their own interests. We recommend that a permanent citizens panel, whose objective it is to protect the health of Wabamun Lake, needs to be established and maintained.This panel must have members who are selected by, and representative of, the community of Wabamun Lake users.Representatives of various interest groups, as well as TransAlta and government agencies should also be included in the membership.A parallel scientific panel, consisting largely of independent scientists but including representation from Alberta Environment and TransAlta should be formed to advise the citizens' panel on the scientific value of any proposed studies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,894
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetAquatic Ecosystems and BiodiversityTravaux en français237 207