MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183238110 · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.115115

Lake Wabamun : a review of scientific studies and environmental impacts /

2004· review· en· W2183238110 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
David W. Schindler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrent UniversityUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsGeographyEnvironmental planningEnvironmental ethicsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following recommendations are in roughly descending order of importance: The parties who would implement these recommendations are not identified in this report since the Panel assumes that responsibility for implementation would be allocated according to a combination of current government agency mandates and activities, industry permit requirements, and input from citizen or scientific advisory groups (see final recommendation). FisheriesDespite heavy recreational activity and industrial use.Lake Wabamun is in moderately good condition.The most serious problem is with the fish community.As a result of commercial fishing, sport overfishing, and destruction of fish habitat, walleye have disappeared from the lake.Few pike survive long enough to reach reproductive age.Lake whitefish have not successfully reproduced for several years. We recommend that commercial fishing be eliminated altogether, and that sport fishing be restricted to catch and release until populations recover to more normal age structures.Past efforts to re-introduce walleye have been unsuccessful.High hooking mortality from catch and release angling is probably responsible. We recommend that any future attempts to reintroduce walleye be accompanied by total closure to angling of areas of the lake where walleye congregate, until several age classes are established.While great efforts have been made to reduce industry-related fish mortalities, they are still significant and in some cases unpredictable in occurrence.They are, however less important than mortalities caused by angling or commercial fishing. We recommend continued vigilance to prevent and correct fish mortalities.These mortalities should also be taken into account in management and allocation of the fisheries resource.Weed harvesting is a relatively insignificant source of direct fish mortality, but it causes a significant loss of fish habitat.Modifications of shoreline properties by cottagers have also resulted in significant loss of fish habitat. We recommend that weed harvesting be discontinued, and that other prohibited destruction of fish habitat, including weedbeds, be monitored and enforced according to the Canada Fisheries Act.Dredgings Disinfection By-products and Thermal Effluents We found that these three topics required no action, for a variety of reasons.Dredging does not appear to be likely to provide significant benefits to the lake.It would require lengthy and thorough investigations to ensure that fish habitat was not destroyed. We do not recommend dredging at this time.Disinfection by-product concentrations for the Wabamun Lake Water Treatment Plant are low, and below thresholds where effects on human or animal health would be expected.Although little is know about effects on aquatic life, concentrations in the discharge are low and vastly diluted by the volume of the lake. Disinfection by-products are not of concern.The thermal effluent from the Wabamun Power Plant will cease as the Plant is decommissioned.Appropriate measures have been taken to mitigate the effects of the thermal effluents.However, the loss of the open water region of the lake in winter after the thermal effluent ceases may result in possible oxygen depletion under ice. We recommend that follow-up studies should investigate the possibility that oxygen depletion under winter ice might occur after heated effluents cease. Additional RecommendationsMany of the past studies of Wabamun Lake have been undertaken by Alberta Environment staff or by consultants hired by TransAlta in response to public perception.Some of the perceptions did not justify scientific study, and some other issues were simply not amenable to scientific investigation.Examples include disinfection by-products and dredging.At present, there are several stakeholder groups that independently pressure Alberta Environment or TransAlta with their own interests. We recommend that a permanent citizens panel, whose objective it is to protect the health of Wabamun Lake, needs to be established and maintained.This panel must have members who are selected by, and representative of, the community of Wabamun Lake users.Representatives of various interest groups, as well as TransAlta and government agencies should also be included in the membership.A parallel scientific panel, consisting largely of independent scientists but including representation from Alberta Environment and TransAlta should be formed to advise the citizens' panel on the scientific value of any proposed studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and BiodiversityFrench-language works237,207