Piercings and tattoos: psychopathological aspects
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: Piercing and tattoos are promoted by fashion and the media and are becoming more and more popular, especially among young people. The number of young adults acquiring body modification has increased in recent years. Different studies showed a correlation between body modification and self-harm behaviors. The present study investigates the correlation between piercing and tattoo and different psychological and personality disorders. METHODS: The study involved 121 samples (age years 23.78 with 3.999 SD – standard deviation). From 121 involved samples, 60 (29 females, 31 males) had not body modifications, 25 have acquired tattoos (48 females, 21 males) and 36 have acquired piercing (24 females, 12 males). All subjects were evaluated using inventory auto somministration. The following tests we re performed: Psychological General WellBeing Index (PGWBI), the Self-Harm Inventory (SHI), the Borderline Syndrome Index (BSI), the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES II), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS20). Data were statistically analyzed by SPSS Tool using one way ANOVA for normally distributed samples, Chi-Square Test and Cross-Tabulation Test. RESULTS: The statistical analysis of acquired results showed a signific ant correlation between body modifications and psychological and personality disorder and psychopathologies. TAS-20 test results highlighted a significant difference between tattoo and piercing groups and control group (F=29.066; p=0.000). The tattoo group showed results closed to alexithymic values. The SHI test proved a significant difference between groups related to self-harm behaviors too (F=80.416; p=0.000). PGWBI results suggest a link between body modification and psychological goodness (F=19.522; p=0.000): precisely the body modifications affect negatively the psychological goodness. The ANOVA clearly shows a significant correlation between piercing and tattoo groups and psychological distress. As regards the dissociative disorder evaluation, while the DES II test results of all groups are within the healthy people common range; however the ANOVA highlights a significant trend towards dissociative disorder limit for piercing and tattoo groups. The ANOVA statistical evaluation of BSI test results provides evidence of borderline disorders on piercing group samples. The tattoo group lays on the test healthy range but the results show a significant higher mean value on the tattoo group compared with control group. Chi-square test, used to highlight all possible connections between analyzed variabconfirmed a significant correlation only between PGWBI results and number of tattoos and piercing and between gender and body modification type, tattoos prevail on male samples while piercing on female ones. CONCLUSION: The study successfully achieved the propos ed objectives, proving statistically
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle