MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2185931365 · doi:10.13110/humanbiology.87.2.0109

Origins of an Unmarked Georgia Cemetery Using Ancient DNA Analysis

2015· article· en· W2185931365 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew T. Ozga, Raúl Y. Tito, Brian M. Kemp, Hugh B. Matternes, Alexandra J. Obregón-Tito, Leslie Jean Neal, Cecil M. Lewis

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Biology · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesDNA Genotek
Mots-clésOsteologyArchaeologyAncient DNAMitochondrial DNAHypervariable regionHaplogroupNative americanGeographyHaplotypeGenealogyHistoryBiologyDemographyPopulationSociologyGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Determining the origins of those buried within undocumented cemeteries is of incredible importance to historical archaeologists and in many cases, the nearby communities.In the case of Avondale Burial Place, a cemetery in Bibb County, Georgia, in use from 1820 to 1950, all written documentation of those interred within it has been lost.Osteological and archaeological evidence alone could not describe, with confidence, the ancestral origins of the 101 individuals buried there.In the present study, we utilize ancient DNA extraction methods to investigate the origins of Avondale Burial Place through the use of well-preserved skeletal fragments from 20 individuals buried in the cemetery.Through examination of hypervariable region I in the mitochondrial genome (HVR1, mtDNA), we determine haplotypes for all 20 of these individuals.A total of 18 of the 20 individuals belong to the L or U haplogroups, suggesting that Avondale Burial Place was most likely used primarily as a resting place for African Americans.After the surrounding Bibb County community expressed interest in investigating potential ancestral relationships to those within the cemetery, a total of eight potential descendants provided saliva in order to obtain mtDNA HVR1 information.This phase of the study revealed that two different individuals from Avondale Burial Place matched two individuals with oral history ties to the cemetery.Using the online tool EMPOP, we calculated the likelihood of these exact matches occurring by chance alone (<1%).The present findings exhibit the importance of genetic analysis of cemetery origins when archaeological and Pre-print version.Visit http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiolafter official publication to acquire the final version osteological data are inconclusive for estimating ancestry of anonymous historical individuals.Avondale Burial Place was unearthed in 2008 during a road expansion in Bibb County, Georgia (Figure 1).New South Associates (NSA) under contract with the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) uncovered 101 human burials but no grave markers of any kind (Matternes et al., 2012).An initial challenge was determining what community was responsible for its construction and then linking the cemetery to the appropriate community.Historical reviews of communities present in southern Bibb County during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were conducted by both the GDOT and NSA (Matternes et al. 2012).The cemetery was not tied to any church, burial society, or other known bodies, nor did it seem to be affiliated with any nineteenth or twentieth century landowners.A review of census records indicated that historically there had always been an African-American presence in the area; however the burial sites for many of these enclaves remained unknown.There were no maps or other records of the cemetery and the lack of headstones hampered identification of specific decedents within the facility.The cemetery's position in the landscape, in an unusable corner of an agricultural field, adjacent to a wetlands area, and away from habitation complexes, was similar to places commonly employed by African-American communities (Martin 2010; Matternes and Richey 2014; Matternes and Smith 2014).While many nineteenth and twentieth century communities viewed the cemetery as a means of social expression to the world at large, many African-American communities perceived burial grounds as private, family-oriented facilities and placed them in the discreet, out of public view locations (Honerkamp and Crook Jr. 2012;Parsons 1923;Sloane 1991).GDOT and NSA investigations suggested that the burial ground was used by African-American communities, but the near absence of historic records on the cemetery and highly ephemeral surface representation precluded making any definitive assertions about the cemetery's place in society.Archaeological evidence suggests Avondale Burial Place was used by African Americans between the 1820 and 1950 with the greatest component of the assemblage likely deposited after the Civil War (Matternes et al. 2012).A concentration of graves was present in the central portion of the complex with later period graves radiating outward.These simple, undecorated coffins with few to any accouterments suggested the Avondale Burial Place had its beginnings as a slave cemetery (Matternes et al. 2012).The graves were all oriented east-west, a common practice of both European-Christian and African-influenced burials.In the case of European-Christians, burials are usually positioned in an east-west alignment with the head facing west in order to allow the dead to face Jesus on his arrival; it is also symbolically attached to rebirth (Milbauer 1989).Early African

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,030

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,180
Tête enseignante GPT0,372
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman BiologyMême sujetHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesTravaux en français237 207