MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Origins of an Unmarked Georgia Cemetery Using Ancient DNA Analysis

2015· article· en· W2185931365 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew T. Ozga, Raúl Y. Tito, Brian M. Kemp, Hugh B. Matternes, Alexandra J. Obregón-Tito, Leslie Jean Neal, Cecil M. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Biology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDNA Genotek
KeywordsOsteologyArchaeologyAncient DNAMitochondrial DNAHypervariable regionHaplogroupNative americanGeographyHaplotypeGenealogyHistoryBiologyDemographyPopulationSociologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Determining the origins of those buried within undocumented cemeteries is of incredible importance to historical archaeologists and in many cases, the nearby communities.In the case of Avondale Burial Place, a cemetery in Bibb County, Georgia, in use from 1820 to 1950, all written documentation of those interred within it has been lost.Osteological and archaeological evidence alone could not describe, with confidence, the ancestral origins of the 101 individuals buried there.In the present study, we utilize ancient DNA extraction methods to investigate the origins of Avondale Burial Place through the use of well-preserved skeletal fragments from 20 individuals buried in the cemetery.Through examination of hypervariable region I in the mitochondrial genome (HVR1, mtDNA), we determine haplotypes for all 20 of these individuals.A total of 18 of the 20 individuals belong to the L or U haplogroups, suggesting that Avondale Burial Place was most likely used primarily as a resting place for African Americans.After the surrounding Bibb County community expressed interest in investigating potential ancestral relationships to those within the cemetery, a total of eight potential descendants provided saliva in order to obtain mtDNA HVR1 information.This phase of the study revealed that two different individuals from Avondale Burial Place matched two individuals with oral history ties to the cemetery.Using the online tool EMPOP, we calculated the likelihood of these exact matches occurring by chance alone (<1%).The present findings exhibit the importance of genetic analysis of cemetery origins when archaeological and Pre-print version.Visit http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiolafter official publication to acquire the final version osteological data are inconclusive for estimating ancestry of anonymous historical individuals.Avondale Burial Place was unearthed in 2008 during a road expansion in Bibb County, Georgia (Figure 1).New South Associates (NSA) under contract with the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) uncovered 101 human burials but no grave markers of any kind (Matternes et al., 2012).An initial challenge was determining what community was responsible for its construction and then linking the cemetery to the appropriate community.Historical reviews of communities present in southern Bibb County during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were conducted by both the GDOT and NSA (Matternes et al. 2012).The cemetery was not tied to any church, burial society, or other known bodies, nor did it seem to be affiliated with any nineteenth or twentieth century landowners.A review of census records indicated that historically there had always been an African-American presence in the area; however the burial sites for many of these enclaves remained unknown.There were no maps or other records of the cemetery and the lack of headstones hampered identification of specific decedents within the facility.The cemetery's position in the landscape, in an unusable corner of an agricultural field, adjacent to a wetlands area, and away from habitation complexes, was similar to places commonly employed by African-American communities (Martin 2010; Matternes and Richey 2014; Matternes and Smith 2014).While many nineteenth and twentieth century communities viewed the cemetery as a means of social expression to the world at large, many African-American communities perceived burial grounds as private, family-oriented facilities and placed them in the discreet, out of public view locations (Honerkamp and Crook Jr. 2012;Parsons 1923;Sloane 1991).GDOT and NSA investigations suggested that the burial ground was used by African-American communities, but the near absence of historic records on the cemetery and highly ephemeral surface representation precluded making any definitive assertions about the cemetery's place in society.Archaeological evidence suggests Avondale Burial Place was used by African Americans between the 1820 and 1950 with the greatest component of the assemblage likely deposited after the Civil War (Matternes et al. 2012).A concentration of graves was present in the central portion of the complex with later period graves radiating outward.These simple, undecorated coffins with few to any accouterments suggested the Avondale Burial Place had its beginnings as a slave cemetery (Matternes et al. 2012).The graves were all oriented east-west, a common practice of both European-Christian and African-influenced burials.In the case of European-Christians, burials are usually positioned in an east-west alignment with the head facing west in order to allow the dead to face Jesus on his arrival; it is also symbolically attached to rebirth (Milbauer 1989).Early African

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman BiologySame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207