Disproportion of economic impact, research achievements and research support in digestive diseases in Canada.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic impact, research output and research support of digestive diseases, and to compare them to those of other common disease entities, specifically mental, cardiovascular, respiratory, and central nervous system diseases. METHODS: Economic burden was assessed with the use of (a) published Canadian government data of direct cost from 1963 to 1993, (b) data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information and (c) recent Canadian economic studies. Research achievements were assessed on the basis of (a) research training in Canadian units, (b) individual achievements by Canadian investigators and (c) contribution to meetings and reception of awards. Research support was assessed by reviewing (a) Canadian government publications, (b) the Association of Canadian Medical Colleges, (c) the Medical Research Council (MRC) of Canada, (d) charitable organizations and (e) the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG). RESULTS: Digestive diseases are responsible for 15% of the total direct economic burden of Canadian health costs, and this figure exceeds those for mental, cardiovascular, respiratory and central nervous system diseases. Hospital discharges for digestive diseases contribute 12% of all hospitalizations and 20% of all neoplasias. Digestive diseases cause short-term loss of productivity, costing $1.14 billion/yr and exceeding the costs of mental, cardiovascular, respiratory and central nervous system diseases. Eighty-one percent of Research Fellows trained in Canadian units entered academic positions, and 63% obtained operating grants. Canadian investigators made important contributions in all areas of digestive science and received major international awards. Government support for digestive diseases was less than that for cardiovascular and neurologic research. In contrast to the highest economic burden, university staffing and residents were fewer for digestive than for mental, cardiovascular, respiratory and neurologic diseases. The number of MRC grants decreased, mainly because of organizational problems. Most charitable organizations support research specifically oriented to the disease of their interest. The CAG was the major supporter of non-specified research. CONCLUSIONS: Digestive diseases are responsible for a major economic burden. Scientists in this field have established international recognition, but research support lags behind the need to correct the economic burden and to provide future generations of scientists in the digestive sciences. There is need for government to readdress this shortcoming and to review its method of support.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».