MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188613511

Disproportion of economic impact, research achievements and research support in digestive diseases in Canada.

2001· article· en· W2188613511 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ivan T. Beck

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)MedicineActivity-based costingIndirect costsProductivityMedical researchMental healthDiseaseEconomic impact analysisEconomic growthBusinessPathologyPsychiatryAccounting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic impact, research output and research support of digestive diseases, and to compare them to those of other common disease entities, specifically mental, cardiovascular, respiratory, and central nervous system diseases. METHODS: Economic burden was assessed with the use of (a) published Canadian government data of direct cost from 1963 to 1993, (b) data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information and (c) recent Canadian economic studies. Research achievements were assessed on the basis of (a) research training in Canadian units, (b) individual achievements by Canadian investigators and (c) contribution to meetings and reception of awards. Research support was assessed by reviewing (a) Canadian government publications, (b) the Association of Canadian Medical Colleges, (c) the Medical Research Council (MRC) of Canada, (d) charitable organizations and (e) the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG). RESULTS: Digestive diseases are responsible for 15% of the total direct economic burden of Canadian health costs, and this figure exceeds those for mental, cardiovascular, respiratory and central nervous system diseases. Hospital discharges for digestive diseases contribute 12% of all hospitalizations and 20% of all neoplasias. Digestive diseases cause short-term loss of productivity, costing $1.14 billion/yr and exceeding the costs of mental, cardiovascular, respiratory and central nervous system diseases. Eighty-one percent of Research Fellows trained in Canadian units entered academic positions, and 63% obtained operating grants. Canadian investigators made important contributions in all areas of digestive science and received major international awards. Government support for digestive diseases was less than that for cardiovascular and neurologic research. In contrast to the highest economic burden, university staffing and residents were fewer for digestive than for mental, cardiovascular, respiratory and neurologic diseases. The number of MRC grants decreased, mainly because of organizational problems. Most charitable organizations support research specifically oriented to the disease of their interest. The CAG was the major supporter of non-specified research. CONCLUSIONS: Digestive diseases are responsible for a major economic burden. Scientists in this field have established international recognition, but research support lags behind the need to correct the economic burden and to provide future generations of scientists in the digestive sciences. There is need for government to readdress this shortcoming and to review its method of support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicNutrition, Health, and Society StudiesFrench-language works237,207