MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W218989274 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.5544.5544

Bosutinib As Second-Line Therapy in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP CML) Resistant or Intolerant to Prior Imatinib: 60-Month Update of a Phase 1/2 Study

2014· article· en· W218989274 sur OpenAlexaff
Tim H. Brümmendorf, Jörge E. Cortes, H. Jean Khoury, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Dong‐Wook Kim, Philippe Schafhausen, Mirjana Zeremski, Mark Shapiro, Eric Leip, Carlo Gambacorti‐Passerini, Jeffrey H. Lipton

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBosutinibMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyImatinibDasatinibImatinib mesylateDiscontinuationNilotinibMyeloid leukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) bosutinib (BOS) is indicated for adults with Ph+ CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy. This long-term update of an ongoing open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluated 2nd-line BOS in CP CML pts aged ≥18 y following imatinib resistance (IM-R) or intolerance (IM-I). This analysis included IM-R (n=195) or IM-I (n=89) CP CML pts receiving BOS starting at 500 mg/d. Median (range) age was 53 (18–91) y; time from CML diagnosis was 3.7 (0.1–15.1) y; treatment duration was 25.6 (0.2-94.9) mo; and follow-up duration was 45.1 (0.6–94.9) mo. BOS dose was escalated to 600 mg/d in 13% of pts. For the last enrolled pt, time from first BOS dose was ≥60 mo (41% of pts still receiving BOS at 5 y). Major cytogenetic responses (MCyR, including complete cytogenetic response [CCyR]) newly attained (54% of pts) or maintained from baseline (6%) are summarized (Table). In 224 pts assessed at baseline, 42 unique BCR-ABL mutations occurred in 78 (35%) pts, including 12 with >1 mutation; common mutations were T315I and F359V (n=9 each), M351T (n=8), G250E and M244V (n=6 each). MCyR rate was similar in pts without mutations (58%) and with 1 single mutation (61%); 45% of pts with >1 mutation and 22% of pts with T315I had MCyR. During therapy, of 92 pts evaluable for mutations, 20 acquired a new BCR-ABL mutation (T315I, n=9; V299L, n=4; E255V, E450A, E450G, G250E, K378E, L273M, and M244V, n=1 each [all in different pts]; 11 of these 20 pts had baseline mutations); 19 of these 20 pts discontinued due to either progressive disease (PD; n=12), lack of efficacy (n=6), or death (n=1). Cumulative incidence of on-treatment PD (ie, transformation to accelerated-/blast-phase [AP/BP] CML, increasing white blood cell count, loss of confirmed complete hematologic response or unconfirmed MCyR) or death* at 5 y was 19% (Table); 40% of pts discontinued BOS prior to 5 y without an event. Kaplan-Meier (KM)–estimated overall survival (OS) at 2 y was 91% (Table; per protocol, pts were followed for OS for only 2 y after BOS discontinuation). Cumulative incidence of on-treatment transformation to AP/BP CML* at 5 y was 4%; 55% of pts discontinued BOS prior to 5 y without transformation. In 12 pts with transformations, 6 were to AP and 6 were to BP. There was limited follow-up of patients after treatment discontinuation. Overall, 168 (59%) pts discontinued BOS within 5 y, commonly due to adverse event (AE; n=64 [23%]) or disease progression (n=47 [17%]) as primary reason for discontinuation. Forty-four (16%) deaths occurred on study, 10 within 30 d of last BOS dose. Most deaths were due to disease progression (n=26; IM-R: 23 pts; IM-I: 3 pts) or AE unrelated to BOS (n=16; IM-R: 14 pts; IM-I: 2 pts); 2 were due to unknown causes. No deaths were reported as BOS-related. The most frequent (≥30%) hematologic treatment-emergent AE (TEAE; all grade/grade 3/4) was thrombocytopenia (42%/26%); common non-hematologic TEAEs were diarrhea (86%/10%), nausea (47%/1%), vomiting (37%/4%), and rash (36%/9%). Cardiac events (MedDRA system organ classification of cardiac disorders) occurred in 17% of pts (8% grade 3/4). Toxicities were managed by ≥1 dose delay in 73% of pts (IM-R: 67%; IM-I: 85%) and by ≥1 dose reduction in 50% of pts (IM-R: 46%; IM-I: 58%). AEs led to BOS discontinuation in 68 (24%) pts (IM-R: n=32 [16%]; IM-I: n=36 [40%]); the most common reason was thrombocytopenia, in 16 (6%) pts (IM-R: n=6 [3%]; IM-I: n=10 [11%]). Overall incidence of newly occurring TEAEs for pts on treatment during specific years was 100% (n=283/284) in year 1 (y1), 74% (n=139/189) in y2, 68% (n=100/148) in y3, 52% (n=68/130) in y4, and 57% (n=70/124) in y5. Discontinuations due to AEs were most common in y1 (18% [n=50/284]); 8, 3, 3, and 1 pts discontinued due to AEs in y2, y3, y4, and y5. After ≥60 mo of follow-up, BOS shows efficacy and manageable toxicity in CP CML pts following IM-R or IM-I. Table IM-R (n=195) IM-I (n=89) Total (n=284) Evaluable,a n 182 80 262 MCyR, n (%) 107 (59) 49 (61) 156 (60) CCyR , n (%) 88 (48) 42 (53) 130 (50) Probability of maintaining MCyR at 5 yb 67% 80% 71% Probability of maintaining CCyR at 5 yb 72% 68% 71% Treated, n 195 89 284 PD/death at 5 yc 23% 10% 19% OS at 2 yb 88% 98% 91% aReceived ≥1 BOS dose and had a valid baseline efficacy assessment for the respective endpoint; responses newly attained or maintained from baseline. bBased on KM estimates. cBased on cumulative incidence, *adjusting for competing risk of treatment discontinuation without event. Disclosures Brümmendorf: Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors: Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors Patents & Royalties; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Kim:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schafhausen:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zeremski:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Shapiro:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Leip:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Gambacorti-Passerini:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lipton:Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,283 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207