MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bosutinib As Second-Line Therapy in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP CML) Resistant or Intolerant to Prior Imatinib: 60-Month Update of a Phase 1/2 Study

2014· article· en· W218989274 on OpenAlexaff
Tim H. Brümmendorf, Jörge E. Cortes, H. Jean Khoury, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Dong‐Wook Kim, Philippe Schafhausen, Mirjana Zeremski, Mark Shapiro, Eric Leip, Carlo Gambacorti‐Passerini, Jeffrey H. Lipton

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBosutinibMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyImatinibDasatinibImatinib mesylateDiscontinuationNilotinibMyeloid leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) bosutinib (BOS) is indicated for adults with Ph+ CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy. This long-term update of an ongoing open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluated 2nd-line BOS in CP CML pts aged ≥18 y following imatinib resistance (IM-R) or intolerance (IM-I). This analysis included IM-R (n=195) or IM-I (n=89) CP CML pts receiving BOS starting at 500 mg/d. Median (range) age was 53 (18–91) y; time from CML diagnosis was 3.7 (0.1–15.1) y; treatment duration was 25.6 (0.2-94.9) mo; and follow-up duration was 45.1 (0.6–94.9) mo. BOS dose was escalated to 600 mg/d in 13% of pts. For the last enrolled pt, time from first BOS dose was ≥60 mo (41% of pts still receiving BOS at 5 y). Major cytogenetic responses (MCyR, including complete cytogenetic response [CCyR]) newly attained (54% of pts) or maintained from baseline (6%) are summarized (Table). In 224 pts assessed at baseline, 42 unique BCR-ABL mutations occurred in 78 (35%) pts, including 12 with >1 mutation; common mutations were T315I and F359V (n=9 each), M351T (n=8), G250E and M244V (n=6 each). MCyR rate was similar in pts without mutations (58%) and with 1 single mutation (61%); 45% of pts with >1 mutation and 22% of pts with T315I had MCyR. During therapy, of 92 pts evaluable for mutations, 20 acquired a new BCR-ABL mutation (T315I, n=9; V299L, n=4; E255V, E450A, E450G, G250E, K378E, L273M, and M244V, n=1 each [all in different pts]; 11 of these 20 pts had baseline mutations); 19 of these 20 pts discontinued due to either progressive disease (PD; n=12), lack of efficacy (n=6), or death (n=1). Cumulative incidence of on-treatment PD (ie, transformation to accelerated-/blast-phase [AP/BP] CML, increasing white blood cell count, loss of confirmed complete hematologic response or unconfirmed MCyR) or death* at 5 y was 19% (Table); 40% of pts discontinued BOS prior to 5 y without an event. Kaplan-Meier (KM)–estimated overall survival (OS) at 2 y was 91% (Table; per protocol, pts were followed for OS for only 2 y after BOS discontinuation). Cumulative incidence of on-treatment transformation to AP/BP CML* at 5 y was 4%; 55% of pts discontinued BOS prior to 5 y without transformation. In 12 pts with transformations, 6 were to AP and 6 were to BP. There was limited follow-up of patients after treatment discontinuation. Overall, 168 (59%) pts discontinued BOS within 5 y, commonly due to adverse event (AE; n=64 [23%]) or disease progression (n=47 [17%]) as primary reason for discontinuation. Forty-four (16%) deaths occurred on study, 10 within 30 d of last BOS dose. Most deaths were due to disease progression (n=26; IM-R: 23 pts; IM-I: 3 pts) or AE unrelated to BOS (n=16; IM-R: 14 pts; IM-I: 2 pts); 2 were due to unknown causes. No deaths were reported as BOS-related. The most frequent (≥30%) hematologic treatment-emergent AE (TEAE; all grade/grade 3/4) was thrombocytopenia (42%/26%); common non-hematologic TEAEs were diarrhea (86%/10%), nausea (47%/1%), vomiting (37%/4%), and rash (36%/9%). Cardiac events (MedDRA system organ classification of cardiac disorders) occurred in 17% of pts (8% grade 3/4). Toxicities were managed by ≥1 dose delay in 73% of pts (IM-R: 67%; IM-I: 85%) and by ≥1 dose reduction in 50% of pts (IM-R: 46%; IM-I: 58%). AEs led to BOS discontinuation in 68 (24%) pts (IM-R: n=32 [16%]; IM-I: n=36 [40%]); the most common reason was thrombocytopenia, in 16 (6%) pts (IM-R: n=6 [3%]; IM-I: n=10 [11%]). Overall incidence of newly occurring TEAEs for pts on treatment during specific years was 100% (n=283/284) in year 1 (y1), 74% (n=139/189) in y2, 68% (n=100/148) in y3, 52% (n=68/130) in y4, and 57% (n=70/124) in y5. Discontinuations due to AEs were most common in y1 (18% [n=50/284]); 8, 3, 3, and 1 pts discontinued due to AEs in y2, y3, y4, and y5. After ≥60 mo of follow-up, BOS shows efficacy and manageable toxicity in CP CML pts following IM-R or IM-I. Table IM-R (n=195) IM-I (n=89) Total (n=284) Evaluable,a n 182 80 262 MCyR, n (%) 107 (59) 49 (61) 156 (60) CCyR , n (%) 88 (48) 42 (53) 130 (50) Probability of maintaining MCyR at 5 yb 67% 80% 71% Probability of maintaining CCyR at 5 yb 72% 68% 71% Treated, n 195 89 284 PD/death at 5 yc 23% 10% 19% OS at 2 yb 88% 98% 91% aReceived ≥1 BOS dose and had a valid baseline efficacy assessment for the respective endpoint; responses newly attained or maintained from baseline. bBased on KM estimates. cBased on cumulative incidence, *adjusting for competing risk of treatment discontinuation without event. Disclosures Brümmendorf: Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors: Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors Patents & Royalties; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Kim:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schafhausen:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zeremski:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Shapiro:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Leip:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Gambacorti-Passerini:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lipton:Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207