Purple Martins Along the King County Marine Shoreline: Citizen Conservation Efforts
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purple martins (Progne subis) are the largest swallows in North America and typically start arriving in the Puget Sound area from their wintering grounds in South America (SE Brazil) in mid-to-late April. They typically leave Puget Sound breeding grounds in late August to early September. They typically nest in colonies and use old woodpecker holes or other natural cavities that are near or adjacent to the shoreline; particularly in marine and estuarine areas of their west coast breeding range. Once prevalent on the west coast, a decline in suitable nesting habitat and competition from non-native birds such as European starlings led to a sharp population decline. In WA, the purple martin is a State Candidate Species and considered a Species of Greatest Conservation Need under the federally mandated State Wildlife Action Plan. In B.C., Canada it is considered a Threatened Species. The removal of dead and dying trees has reduced the number of natural snags and removal of creosote-treated pilings has reduced opportunities for placement of artificial housing over water. In Puget Sound, most purple martins are dependent on artificial nest cavities. Several active nesting colonies have been established along the marine shoreline in King County, including 7 colonies on Vashon-Maury Islands (46 nesting pairs in 2013), one in Seattle (Ballard) (16 nesting pairs in 2013), and another in Seattle near Kellogg island (~6-10 nesting pairs in 2013) along the Duwamish River. Monitoring and maintenance of purple martin colonies in WA are almost entirely dependent upon citizen volunteers. The WA State Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW) is currently in the process of updating a regional database to document active nest site locations which will assist volunteers in site selection for future colony expansion. A purple martin recovery and stewardship program was established in B.C. in 1985 which has increased the population from less than 6 breeding pairs to ~ 500-600 pairs, but no such program currently exists for WA. Largely through volunteer efforts, in coordination with WDFW and other stakeholders such as local Audubon chapters, there is a desire to bring similar management attention to this species via citizen stewardship programs. Currently, the efforts of King County volunteers offer a model to expand off of with area collaborators. The end result being support of this species, local populations, and learning more of the particular ecological needs and synergistic factors that may affect these birds throughout their Pacific Northwest range.The populations that exist currently largely remain due to local volunteer martin steward efforts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».