MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2193730750

Purple Martins Along the King County Marine Shoreline: Citizen Conservation Efforts

2014· article· en· W2193730750 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean F. Power

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland and Wildlife Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreatened speciesGeographyHabitatFisheryWildlifeShoreHabitat destructionWildlife conservationPopulationRange (aeronautics)Nest (protein structural motif)Endangered speciesWoodpeckerEcologyEnvironmental protectionBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purple martins (Progne subis) are the largest swallows in North America and typically start arriving in the Puget Sound area from their wintering grounds in South America (SE Brazil) in mid-to-late April. They typically leave Puget Sound breeding grounds in late August to early September. They typically nest in colonies and use old woodpecker holes or other natural cavities that are near or adjacent to the shoreline; particularly in marine and estuarine areas of their west coast breeding range. Once prevalent on the west coast, a decline in suitable nesting habitat and competition from non-native birds such as European starlings led to a sharp population decline. In WA, the purple martin is a State Candidate Species and considered a Species of Greatest Conservation Need under the federally mandated State Wildlife Action Plan. In B.C., Canada it is considered a Threatened Species. The removal of dead and dying trees has reduced the number of natural snags and removal of creosote-treated pilings has reduced opportunities for placement of artificial housing over water. In Puget Sound, most purple martins are dependent on artificial nest cavities. Several active nesting colonies have been established along the marine shoreline in King County, including 7 colonies on Vashon-Maury Islands (46 nesting pairs in 2013), one in Seattle (Ballard) (16 nesting pairs in 2013), and another in Seattle near Kellogg island (~6-10 nesting pairs in 2013) along the Duwamish River. Monitoring and maintenance of purple martin colonies in WA are almost entirely dependent upon citizen volunteers. The WA State Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW) is currently in the process of updating a regional database to document active nest site locations which will assist volunteers in site selection for future colony expansion. A purple martin recovery and stewardship program was established in B.C. in 1985 which has increased the population from less than 6 breeding pairs to ~ 500-600 pairs, but no such program currently exists for WA. Largely through volunteer efforts, in coordination with WDFW and other stakeholders such as local Audubon chapters, there is a desire to bring similar management attention to this species via citizen stewardship programs. Currently, the efforts of King County volunteers offer a model to expand off of with area collaborators. The end result being support of this species, local populations, and learning more of the particular ecological needs and synergistic factors that may affect these birds throughout their Pacific Northwest range.The populations that exist currently largely remain due to local volunteer martin steward efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicRangeland and Wildlife ManagementFrench-language works237,207