MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2200234494

Are there any trees in the Arctic? Reconstruction of evolutionary histories in a young biome

2007· dissertation· en· W2200234494 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tor Carlsen

Notice bibliographique

RevueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2007
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetic diversity and population structure
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVNorges ForskningsrådUniversitetet i OsloAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaRoyal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Mots-clésBiomeArcticThe arcticGeographyEvolutionary biologyEcologyBiologyGeologyOceanographyEcosystem
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reconstructing molecular phylogenies and unraveling biogeographic histories of arctic plants are needed to obtain better insights into the processes of evolution, dispersal and colonization in this young biome. Studies of dispersal into, and speciation within, the Arctic are important to obtain better knowledge of the source areas for arctic biodiversity. Unraveling the history of recently diverged lineages such as those typical for the young arctic biome is challenging, because it is difficult to find molecular markers with sufficient variation and to handle the problem of incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization. Thus several different molecular marker systems for many potentially suitable model groups were tested and developed. Three genera which are represented in Beringia (the Asian and American land masses surrounding the Bering Strait from Lena River to Mackenzie River) and which have assumed phylogenetic connections to plants living in East Asia and North America were selected. Two of these genera are also good candidates for studying polyploidization as a mode of speciation in the Arctic, as they show large variation in chromosome number within and among the species. This study was also intended to contribute to the PanArctic Flora project by providing data to help resolving the taxonomy of some challenging species complexes.
\n- The history of the genus Smelowskia was reconstructed based on microsatellite loci combined with sequences of nuclear and plastid regions. An Asian origin of the genus and two independent dispersal events into the Beringian and North American regions were inferred. We also found evidence for merging the Beringian S. porsildii, S. spathulatifolia, and S. jurtzevii into one species; S. porsildii.
\n- The biogeography and phylogeny of the large genus Cardamine were inferred based on nuclear and plastid sequences. The phylogenetic trees showed limited resolutions, supporting a hypothesis of recent and rapid speciation in the genus. We found evidence for several extremely long-distant dispersal events. Dispersal into the Southern Hemisphere and the Arctic has occurred repeatedly, and we identified at least three phylogenetically distinct arctic lineages. Polyploidization has occurred independently many times during the evolution of Cardamine. Rapid divergence combined with widespread polyploidization offer an explanation for the complex evolutionary history of the genus. Two species complexes within this genus were selected for more detailed studies.
\n- Six microsatellite loci originally developed for the Arabidopsis genome, were used to identify evolutionary and taxonomic units within the Beringian Cardamine digitata aggregate. Molecular groups corresponding to morphological differences suggested recognition of four species in this complex; C. blaisdellii, C. digitata, C. microphylla, and C. purpurea. Each species included at least two ploidy levels, indicating recurrent polyploidizations.
\n- As a first step towards addressing the origin of the circumarctic Cardamine bellidifolia,we conducted a study with main focus on its two putatively most closely related European alpine species (C. alpina and C. resedifolia) using AFLPs. Surprisingly, the arctic species C. bellidifolia was distinctly differentiated from its putative alpine ancestral lineages.
\nContrasting phylogeographies were inferred between the two alpine species C. alpina and C. resedifolia. A high degree of genetic distinction was found between the Alpine and Pyreneean populations of C. alpina. In addition, a high level of diversity was found within Pyreneean populations compared to Alpine populations. In contrast, C. resedifolia showed more genetic variation among populations in the Alps than between the Alps and distant areas such as Corsica, the Carpatians and the Pyrenees. These results show that the two species have very different histories of glacial survival and recolonization.
\n- To facilitate these and future studies of recently diverged taxa, we developed 72 new microsatellite loci and tested 15 previously published loci for the Brassicaceae. We found them to provide variation among and within three distantly related genera: Cardamine, Smelowskia, and Draba. Of these 87 loci, 18 were variable within Cardamine, while ten were variable within Smelowskia. Seventy-one of these primers were variable within Draba, and 50 were variable within Draba nivalis. The markers amplifying across these genera are potentially suitable for studying other genera in Brassicaceae as well.
\n- A phylogeographic analysis of Cassiope tetragona including both Central Asian and Beringian relatives revealed that the circumpolar ssp. tetragona was well separated from the North American ssp. saximontana. A Beringian origin of C. tetragona ssp. tetragona was inferred, and the levels and geographical patterns of differentiation and gene diversity suggested that the latest expansion from Beringia into the Circumarctic was recent, possibly during the current interglacial. The results were in accordance with a recent leading-edge mode of colonization, particularly towards the east throughout Canada/Greenland and across the North Atlantic into Scandinavia and Svalbard.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,109
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,952

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Même sujetGenetic diversity and population structureTravaux en français237 207