MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2200234494

Are there any trees in the Arctic? Reconstruction of evolutionary histories in a young biome

2007· dissertation· en· W2200234494 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tor Carlsen

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVNorges ForskningsrådUniversitetet i OsloAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaRoyal Swedish Academy of Sciences
KeywordsBiomeArcticThe arcticGeographyEvolutionary biologyEcologyBiologyGeologyOceanographyEcosystem
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconstructing molecular phylogenies and unraveling biogeographic histories of arctic plants are needed to obtain better insights into the processes of evolution, dispersal and colonization in this young biome. Studies of dispersal into, and speciation within, the Arctic are important to obtain better knowledge of the source areas for arctic biodiversity. Unraveling the history of recently diverged lineages such as those typical for the young arctic biome is challenging, because it is difficult to find molecular markers with sufficient variation and to handle the problem of incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization. Thus several different molecular marker systems for many potentially suitable model groups were tested and developed. Three genera which are represented in Beringia (the Asian and American land masses surrounding the Bering Strait from Lena River to Mackenzie River) and which have assumed phylogenetic connections to plants living in East Asia and North America were selected. Two of these genera are also good candidates for studying polyploidization as a mode of speciation in the Arctic, as they show large variation in chromosome number within and among the species. This study was also intended to contribute to the PanArctic Flora project by providing data to help resolving the taxonomy of some challenging species complexes.
\n- The history of the genus Smelowskia was reconstructed based on microsatellite loci combined with sequences of nuclear and plastid regions. An Asian origin of the genus and two independent dispersal events into the Beringian and North American regions were inferred. We also found evidence for merging the Beringian S. porsildii, S. spathulatifolia, and S. jurtzevii into one species; S. porsildii.
\n- The biogeography and phylogeny of the large genus Cardamine were inferred based on nuclear and plastid sequences. The phylogenetic trees showed limited resolutions, supporting a hypothesis of recent and rapid speciation in the genus. We found evidence for several extremely long-distant dispersal events. Dispersal into the Southern Hemisphere and the Arctic has occurred repeatedly, and we identified at least three phylogenetically distinct arctic lineages. Polyploidization has occurred independently many times during the evolution of Cardamine. Rapid divergence combined with widespread polyploidization offer an explanation for the complex evolutionary history of the genus. Two species complexes within this genus were selected for more detailed studies.
\n- Six microsatellite loci originally developed for the Arabidopsis genome, were used to identify evolutionary and taxonomic units within the Beringian Cardamine digitata aggregate. Molecular groups corresponding to morphological differences suggested recognition of four species in this complex; C. blaisdellii, C. digitata, C. microphylla, and C. purpurea. Each species included at least two ploidy levels, indicating recurrent polyploidizations.
\n- As a first step towards addressing the origin of the circumarctic Cardamine bellidifolia,we conducted a study with main focus on its two putatively most closely related European alpine species (C. alpina and C. resedifolia) using AFLPs. Surprisingly, the arctic species C. bellidifolia was distinctly differentiated from its putative alpine ancestral lineages.
\nContrasting phylogeographies were inferred between the two alpine species C. alpina and C. resedifolia. A high degree of genetic distinction was found between the Alpine and Pyreneean populations of C. alpina. In addition, a high level of diversity was found within Pyreneean populations compared to Alpine populations. In contrast, C. resedifolia showed more genetic variation among populations in the Alps than between the Alps and distant areas such as Corsica, the Carpatians and the Pyrenees. These results show that the two species have very different histories of glacial survival and recolonization.
\n- To facilitate these and future studies of recently diverged taxa, we developed 72 new microsatellite loci and tested 15 previously published loci for the Brassicaceae. We found them to provide variation among and within three distantly related genera: Cardamine, Smelowskia, and Draba. Of these 87 loci, 18 were variable within Cardamine, while ten were variable within Smelowskia. Seventy-one of these primers were variable within Draba, and 50 were variable within Draba nivalis. The markers amplifying across these genera are potentially suitable for studying other genera in Brassicaceae as well.
\n- A phylogeographic analysis of Cassiope tetragona including both Central Asian and Beringian relatives revealed that the circumpolar ssp. tetragona was well separated from the North American ssp. saximontana. A Beringian origin of C. tetragona ssp. tetragona was inferred, and the levels and geographical patterns of differentiation and gene diversity suggested that the latest expansion from Beringia into the Circumarctic was recent, possibly during the current interglacial. The results were in accordance with a recent leading-edge mode of colonization, particularly towards the east throughout Canada/Greenland and across the North Atlantic into Scandinavia and Svalbard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Same topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207