Either Combined-Modality Or Radiotherapy Alone Provide Favorable Outcome In Stage I-II Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Report Of 82 Patients From The International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Patients with Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) often present with advanced-stage and have a poor prognosis. Although MCL is highly radiosensitive, RT is rarely used other than for palliation. Stage I-II presentation is rare, and there is only limited data on treatment outcome with less aggressive combined modality approaches or RT alone. To assess the outcome of this group of patients, we retrospectively reviewed 82 patients referred to radiation oncology at 9 ILROG institutions between 1990 and 2012. Of the 82 patients, 65 (79%) were males, 44 (54%) were > 60 years; 47 (57%) were stage I, 61 (74%) presented in the head and neck areas, 51 (62%) had extranodal presentation, 14 (17%) were bulky (>5 cm). Treatment approaches consisted of combined modality (CM) with chemotherapy and consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in 66 (80%) and definitive RT alone in 16 (20%). The median radiation dose used was 35 Gy (range 12-45). Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like, regimens in 62 (57%), rituximab was added to chemotherapy in 51 (62%). The median follow-up was 60 months (range 5-245). At last follow up, 26 (32%) patients relapsed (70% of relapses were outside the radiation field) and 21 (26%) died (2 deaths unrelated to disease or treatment). The 5-and 10-years overall survivals (OS) were 71% and 63%, respectively. The 5-and 10-years disease free survivals (DFS) were 75% and 39%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the following characteristics were significantly associated with DFS and OS: age as a continuous variable (HR=1.05, p=0.005 for DFS; HR=1.05, p=0.006 for OS) and bulky disease (HR=2.78, p=0.03 for DFS; HR= 3.18, p=0.02 for OS). On multivariate analysis, both DFS and OS were significantly influenced by: age as a continuous variable (HR=2.09, p=0.03; HR=1.05, p=0.005), bulky disease (HR=2.23, p=0.05; HR=3.1, p=0.03), and female gender only affected DFS (HR=2.16, p=0.03).SurvivalAll (%)Combined modality (%)RT alone up-front(%)5-years OS71689210-years OS6362745-years DFS75738910-years DFS393657 Conclusion Patients who presented with stage I-II MCL and were treated with programs that included consolidative local radiotherapy or even radiotherapy alone demonstrated favorable disease control and relatively long survival. It appears that radiotherapy as a sole modality can offer in selected patients a comparable DFS and OS to a combined modality approach. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».