Either Combined-Modality Or Radiotherapy Alone Provide Favorable Outcome In Stage I-II Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Report Of 82 Patients From The International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Patients with Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) often present with advanced-stage and have a poor prognosis. Although MCL is highly radiosensitive, RT is rarely used other than for palliation. Stage I-II presentation is rare, and there is only limited data on treatment outcome with less aggressive combined modality approaches or RT alone. To assess the outcome of this group of patients, we retrospectively reviewed 82 patients referred to radiation oncology at 9 ILROG institutions between 1990 and 2012. Of the 82 patients, 65 (79%) were males, 44 (54%) were > 60 years; 47 (57%) were stage I, 61 (74%) presented in the head and neck areas, 51 (62%) had extranodal presentation, 14 (17%) were bulky (>5 cm). Treatment approaches consisted of combined modality (CM) with chemotherapy and consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in 66 (80%) and definitive RT alone in 16 (20%). The median radiation dose used was 35 Gy (range 12-45). Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like, regimens in 62 (57%), rituximab was added to chemotherapy in 51 (62%). The median follow-up was 60 months (range 5-245). At last follow up, 26 (32%) patients relapsed (70% of relapses were outside the radiation field) and 21 (26%) died (2 deaths unrelated to disease or treatment). The 5-and 10-years overall survivals (OS) were 71% and 63%, respectively. The 5-and 10-years disease free survivals (DFS) were 75% and 39%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the following characteristics were significantly associated with DFS and OS: age as a continuous variable (HR=1.05, p=0.005 for DFS; HR=1.05, p=0.006 for OS) and bulky disease (HR=2.78, p=0.03 for DFS; HR= 3.18, p=0.02 for OS). On multivariate analysis, both DFS and OS were significantly influenced by: age as a continuous variable (HR=2.09, p=0.03; HR=1.05, p=0.005), bulky disease (HR=2.23, p=0.05; HR=3.1, p=0.03), and female gender only affected DFS (HR=2.16, p=0.03).SurvivalAll (%)Combined modality (%)RT alone up-front(%)5-years OS71689210-years OS6362745-years DFS75738910-years DFS393657 Conclusion Patients who presented with stage I-II MCL and were treated with programs that included consolidative local radiotherapy or even radiotherapy alone demonstrated favorable disease control and relatively long survival. It appears that radiotherapy as a sole modality can offer in selected patients a comparable DFS and OS to a combined modality approach. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".