MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2222184804

Confused and Nearly Naked after Going on Spending Sprees

2014· article· en· W2222184804 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew Davis, David G. Folks

Notice bibliographique

RevueCurrent psychiatry · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePsychiatric care and mental health services
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePsychiatryPhysical examinationSittingSurgery
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

CASE Nearly naked Mr. A, age 68, is found sitting in his car, wearing only a jacket, underpants, and boots. He speaks of spreading a message about Osama bin Laden and a census. Police officers bring him to a hospital emergency department for evaluation. The examining clinician determines that Mr. A is a danger to himself and others because of mental illness, leading to admission to our state psychiatric hospital. Mr. A's wife describes recent spending sprees with large purchases. She had obtained a restraining order against her husband because of his threatening remarks and behaviors. Within days of the order issuance, he got a home equity loan and purchased a $300,000 house. The medical history is notable for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Although he is not taking medications, his blood sugar is well controlled. Other than an initial resting heart rate of 116 beats per minute, vital signs are stable and within normal limits. Physical examination is unremarkable. Screening laboratory studies are notable for mildly elevated hepatic function, which approaches normal range several days after admission. Mr. A reports a remote history of alcohol abuse but says he had not been drinking recently, and does not detail his pattern of use. Urine toxicology screen is negative for all substances of abuse. Mental status examination reveals disheveled appearance, motor agitation, pressured speech, labile affect, loosening of associations, grandiose delusions, and auditory hallucinations. Mr. A's thought processes are grossly disorganized, such that we could not gather a meaningful history. He believes God is speaking directly to him about plans to build a carousel at Disney World. He makes strange gestures with his hands throughout the interview, as if attempting to trace the shapes of letters and numbers. He frequently speaks of seeing an array of colors. Cognitive examination reveals a score of 5 of 30 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Figure 1), indicating a severe impairment in neurocognitive functioning. He demonstrates limited insight and markedly impaired judgment, and denies having a mental illness. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] What should be the next step in managing Mr. A? a) obtain records from other facilities and collateral history b) start an antipsychotic c) order a brain MRI d) start an alcohol withdrawal protocol The authors observations Mr. A showed elements of mania, psychosis, and delirium. We considered a broad differential diagnosis (Table, page 58). Mr. A initially could not provide reliable or accurate information. The least invasive next step was to obtain additional history from his wife and other medical records to refine the differential diagnosis. Table Differential diagnosis of delirious mania Dementia Head trauma Hypoglycemia Hypoxemia Infection (HIV. Lyme disease, tuberculosis. syphilis, bacterial illness) Metabolic disturbances and endocrinopathies Neoplasms Poisons that impact central nervous system functioning Psychiatric illness (including bipolar disorder, schizophrenia) Seizures Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome and substance-related cognitive impairment or withdrawal syndrome HISTORY Bizarre behavior Mr. A allows staff to speak with his wife and obtain records from a psychiatric hospitalization 3 years earlier. Mrs. A reports significant and rapid changes in her husband's behavior and personality over 3 months, but does not describe a recent alcohol relapse. Mr. A sleeps very little, remaining awake and active throughout the night. He frequently rearranges the furniture in their home for no clear reason. Once, he knocked on the door of a young female neighbor asking if she found him attractive. Mr. A has a significant criminal history. Approximately 30 years ago, he was charged with attempted murder of his ex-wife and he had faced charges of attempted kidnapping and assaulting a police officer. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,298
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,336
Écart entre enseignants0,318 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCurrent psychiatryMême sujetPsychiatric care and mental health servicesTravaux en français237 207