MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2222184804

Confused and Nearly Naked after Going on Spending Sprees

2014· article· en· W2222184804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew Davis, David G. Folks

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent psychiatry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychiatric care and mental health services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychiatryPhysical examinationSittingSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CASE Nearly naked Mr. A, age 68, is found sitting in his car, wearing only a jacket, underpants, and boots. He speaks of spreading a message about Osama bin Laden and a census. Police officers bring him to a hospital emergency department for evaluation. The examining clinician determines that Mr. A is a danger to himself and others because of mental illness, leading to admission to our state psychiatric hospital. Mr. A's wife describes recent spending sprees with large purchases. She had obtained a restraining order against her husband because of his threatening remarks and behaviors. Within days of the order issuance, he got a home equity loan and purchased a $300,000 house. The medical history is notable for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Although he is not taking medications, his blood sugar is well controlled. Other than an initial resting heart rate of 116 beats per minute, vital signs are stable and within normal limits. Physical examination is unremarkable. Screening laboratory studies are notable for mildly elevated hepatic function, which approaches normal range several days after admission. Mr. A reports a remote history of alcohol abuse but says he had not been drinking recently, and does not detail his pattern of use. Urine toxicology screen is negative for all substances of abuse. Mental status examination reveals disheveled appearance, motor agitation, pressured speech, labile affect, loosening of associations, grandiose delusions, and auditory hallucinations. Mr. A's thought processes are grossly disorganized, such that we could not gather a meaningful history. He believes God is speaking directly to him about plans to build a carousel at Disney World. He makes strange gestures with his hands throughout the interview, as if attempting to trace the shapes of letters and numbers. He frequently speaks of seeing an array of colors. Cognitive examination reveals a score of 5 of 30 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Figure 1), indicating a severe impairment in neurocognitive functioning. He demonstrates limited insight and markedly impaired judgment, and denies having a mental illness. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] What should be the next step in managing Mr. A? a) obtain records from other facilities and collateral history b) start an antipsychotic c) order a brain MRI d) start an alcohol withdrawal protocol The authors observations Mr. A showed elements of mania, psychosis, and delirium. We considered a broad differential diagnosis (Table, page 58). Mr. A initially could not provide reliable or accurate information. The least invasive next step was to obtain additional history from his wife and other medical records to refine the differential diagnosis. Table Differential diagnosis of delirious mania Dementia Head trauma Hypoglycemia Hypoxemia Infection (HIV. Lyme disease, tuberculosis. syphilis, bacterial illness) Metabolic disturbances and endocrinopathies Neoplasms Poisons that impact central nervous system functioning Psychiatric illness (including bipolar disorder, schizophrenia) Seizures Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome and substance-related cognitive impairment or withdrawal syndrome HISTORY Bizarre behavior Mr. A allows staff to speak with his wife and obtain records from a psychiatric hospitalization 3 years earlier. Mrs. A reports significant and rapid changes in her husband's behavior and personality over 3 months, but does not describe a recent alcohol relapse. Mr. A sleeps very little, remaining awake and active throughout the night. He frequently rearranges the furniture in their home for no clear reason. Once, he knocked on the door of a young female neighbor asking if she found him attractive. Mr. A has a significant criminal history. Approximately 30 years ago, he was charged with attempted murder of his ex-wife and he had faced charges of attempted kidnapping and assaulting a police officer. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent psychiatrySame topicPsychiatric care and mental health servicesFrench-language works237,207