MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2229090019 · doi:10.2134/agronj15.0909

Water Security for Agriculture: Introduction to the Water Security Task Force Symposium

2015· article· en· W2229090019 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. F. Vocasek, G. A. Peterson

Notice bibliographique

RevueAgronomy Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFood securityAgricultureWater securityPopulationBusinessWater resource managementEnvironmental scienceGeographyWater resourcesEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The American Society of Agronomy (ASA) created the Water Security for Agriculture Task Force at its annual meeting in San Antonio, TX, in 2011. The “Task Force” was proposed by the ASA Science Policy Committee as follows: Globally, agriculture consumes approximately 70% of the fresh water used by humans (Baroni et al., 2007). In the United States, approximately 50% of crop production comes from the 15% of cropland that is irrigated. Some estimate that by 2025 more than half of the world population will be facing water-based vulnerability (Kulshreshtha, 1998). Water security and food security go hand-in-hand. To offset undesirable impacts, significant improvements in water conservation and water management are urgently needed to meet the food, feed, fiber, and fuel needs of a growing world population. Shallow groundwater flooding in Wisconsin Sink holes developing from extensive groundwater withdrawal in Florida A “grab” of arable land to control community water rights in Colorado Protection of fish habitat in the Pacific Northwest The decline of Ogallala Aquifer in the Great Plains The ongoing need to increase the capacity of municipal and industrial wastewater disposal, and geographic transfer of water through trans-basin diversion The ASA Science Policy Committee believed it was essential that ASA be engaged in the policy issues related to water security. ASA can provide information to help develop informed policy that may mitigate undesirable outcomes and plan for the future. The ASA Science Policy Committee wishes to form a workgroup that would (1) identify the key policy issues facing the agricultural sector; (2) develop a strategy for using agronomic science to inform the dialogue associated with the issues, and (3) determine outcomes that we wish to achieve through our activities. The ASA Board accepted the proposal and created an ad-hoc, short-term task force to develop position statements. The Task Force was charged to keep agronomy and the role of the agronomist in the forefront. Agronomy is not a commodity, but is a skill or skill set with a process. The process involves inquiry and research, expressed by education (both academic and extension), resulting in application and implementation. Board appointees to the Water Security for Agriculture Task Force were: Fred Vocasek (Servi-Tech), Chair; Karl Anderson (ASA Science Policy); Bob Beck (Winfield Solutions); Jim Gaffney (DuPont Pioneer); Neil Hansen (Colorado State Univ.); Bill Heer (Kansas State Univ.); Bruce Knight (Strategic Conservation Solutions); Gary Peterson (Colorado State Univ., retired); and John Sadler (USDA-ARS). The Task Force met in Baltimore, MD, in January 2012 to develop a strategy. Initial discussions included representatives from the USEPA, USDA-NRCS, and USGS. Water shortage (competition, climate change, groundwater depletion) Water excesses (climate change, erosion, drainage, development) Water quality (nutrient management, salinity, subsurface nitrogen, off-site losses) Stopping water at its highest point in the watershed Capturing precipitation in the soil rather than allowing runoff Using the water soon after it is received to improve efficiency Moving excess water to areas of shortage in space and time Creating nutrient management plans Educating both the agricultural sector and the general public about the critical nature of water security The Task Force concluded that we have sufficient research data to address most of the problems, but are lacking in adoption of practices. It was agreed that the general public needed to be made aware of the critical nature of agricultural water security. The Task Force focused on how ASA could improve adoption of practices at the farmer/user level and how to create public awareness. One action was to prepare written communications that summarize our knowledge regarding the three pressing needs categories. Questions remained regarding who the appropriate audience would be, who should author the papers, and how many papers were needed. Obviously the publications needed to be placed where they could be found by the appropriate readership. The ASA has excellent venues for scientific papers, but they usually do not reach the user level, or the general public. A multi-pronged approach was obviously needed to reach the identified audiences. The Task Force identified multi-disciplinary symposia presentations as a way to increase awareness among scientists. Two symposia were proposed, one at the AAAS 2013 Annual Meetings in Boston, MA, and a second, repeat, symposium at the 2013 ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meetings in Tampa, FL. Dr. John Sadler and Fred Vocasek led the AAAS and ASA Symposium efforts entitled “Green Dreams, Blue Waves, and Shades of Gray: The Reality of Water.” Lead speakers were Daniel Hillel (2012 Borlaug World Food Prize), “Water—The Life Blood of Our World”; Henry Lin (hydrologist, Penn State Univ.), “Water Security Begins with an Adequate Blue Water Supply,” Bob Stewart (director, Dryland Agriculture Institute), “Green Water Supply—the Key Element in Food Security,” and Steel Maloney (principal hydrologist, Cascade Earth Sciences, “Converting Gray Water to Green Water.” Lead speakers were followed by a panel of experts: Bill Cox (CoxCo Agricultural Consulting), “Practical Solutions to Agriculture's Water Issues”; John Peck (professor of water law, Kansas Univ.), “Land, Law, and Water: Removing Barriers to Water Security”; and Chris Goemans (resource economist, Colorado State Univ.), “Economics: Its Impact on Water Security.” Following the symposia, the Societies’ science communication staff produced several articles based on interviews with the symposium speakers. Articles included “Three Shades of Water: Increasing Water Security with Blue, Green, and Gray Water”; “Reusing Wastewater for Crop Irrigation in Kansas”; and “Subsurface Drip Irrigation.” The articles were published in the CSA News magazine, which is distributed to all ASA, CSSA, and SSSA members, and in the Crops & Soils magazine, which is distributed to 13,000 Certified Crop Advisers (CCAs) in the United States and Canada. Many CCAs are employed by retail or wholesale agribusinesses and work directly with producers. Further outreach to the user community was attained by live-casting the 2013 ASA symposium for CCA continuing education credit. ASA continues to offer soil and water management training through a full-time Agronomy and Soil Science Education Manager. Educational offerings include webinars and self-paced, self-study modules. Definition of water security Global water resources Water resources and food security Blue water demand for sustainable intensification Managing green water in dryland agriculture Environmental impact of water use in agriculture Towards achieving water security in agriculture Legal constraints on conserving water in the western United States Research and development principles The authors have done an excellent job in summarizing the various aspects of our knowledge of water security in agriculture, and we thank them for their efforts. The remaining step is to develop impactful “one-pager” documents to use in communication with the general public.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,340
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,627

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,195
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAgronomy JournalMême sujetWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesTravaux en français237 207