Water Security for Agriculture: Introduction to the Water Security Task Force Symposium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The American Society of Agronomy (ASA) created the Water Security for Agriculture Task Force at its annual meeting in San Antonio, TX, in 2011. The “Task Force” was proposed by the ASA Science Policy Committee as follows: Globally, agriculture consumes approximately 70% of the fresh water used by humans (Baroni et al., 2007). In the United States, approximately 50% of crop production comes from the 15% of cropland that is irrigated. Some estimate that by 2025 more than half of the world population will be facing water-based vulnerability (Kulshreshtha, 1998). Water security and food security go hand-in-hand. To offset undesirable impacts, significant improvements in water conservation and water management are urgently needed to meet the food, feed, fiber, and fuel needs of a growing world population. Shallow groundwater flooding in Wisconsin Sink holes developing from extensive groundwater withdrawal in Florida A “grab” of arable land to control community water rights in Colorado Protection of fish habitat in the Pacific Northwest The decline of Ogallala Aquifer in the Great Plains The ongoing need to increase the capacity of municipal and industrial wastewater disposal, and geographic transfer of water through trans-basin diversion The ASA Science Policy Committee believed it was essential that ASA be engaged in the policy issues related to water security. ASA can provide information to help develop informed policy that may mitigate undesirable outcomes and plan for the future. The ASA Science Policy Committee wishes to form a workgroup that would (1) identify the key policy issues facing the agricultural sector; (2) develop a strategy for using agronomic science to inform the dialogue associated with the issues, and (3) determine outcomes that we wish to achieve through our activities. The ASA Board accepted the proposal and created an ad-hoc, short-term task force to develop position statements. The Task Force was charged to keep agronomy and the role of the agronomist in the forefront. Agronomy is not a commodity, but is a skill or skill set with a process. The process involves inquiry and research, expressed by education (both academic and extension), resulting in application and implementation. Board appointees to the Water Security for Agriculture Task Force were: Fred Vocasek (Servi-Tech), Chair; Karl Anderson (ASA Science Policy); Bob Beck (Winfield Solutions); Jim Gaffney (DuPont Pioneer); Neil Hansen (Colorado State Univ.); Bill Heer (Kansas State Univ.); Bruce Knight (Strategic Conservation Solutions); Gary Peterson (Colorado State Univ., retired); and John Sadler (USDA-ARS). The Task Force met in Baltimore, MD, in January 2012 to develop a strategy. Initial discussions included representatives from the USEPA, USDA-NRCS, and USGS. Water shortage (competition, climate change, groundwater depletion) Water excesses (climate change, erosion, drainage, development) Water quality (nutrient management, salinity, subsurface nitrogen, off-site losses) Stopping water at its highest point in the watershed Capturing precipitation in the soil rather than allowing runoff Using the water soon after it is received to improve efficiency Moving excess water to areas of shortage in space and time Creating nutrient management plans Educating both the agricultural sector and the general public about the critical nature of water security The Task Force concluded that we have sufficient research data to address most of the problems, but are lacking in adoption of practices. It was agreed that the general public needed to be made aware of the critical nature of agricultural water security. The Task Force focused on how ASA could improve adoption of practices at the farmer/user level and how to create public awareness. One action was to prepare written communications that summarize our knowledge regarding the three pressing needs categories. Questions remained regarding who the appropriate audience would be, who should author the papers, and how many papers were needed. Obviously the publications needed to be placed where they could be found by the appropriate readership. The ASA has excellent venues for scientific papers, but they usually do not reach the user level, or the general public. A multi-pronged approach was obviously needed to reach the identified audiences. The Task Force identified multi-disciplinary symposia presentations as a way to increase awareness among scientists. Two symposia were proposed, one at the AAAS 2013 Annual Meetings in Boston, MA, and a second, repeat, symposium at the 2013 ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meetings in Tampa, FL. Dr. John Sadler and Fred Vocasek led the AAAS and ASA Symposium efforts entitled “Green Dreams, Blue Waves, and Shades of Gray: The Reality of Water.” Lead speakers were Daniel Hillel (2012 Borlaug World Food Prize), “Water—The Life Blood of Our World”; Henry Lin (hydrologist, Penn State Univ.), “Water Security Begins with an Adequate Blue Water Supply,” Bob Stewart (director, Dryland Agriculture Institute), “Green Water Supply—the Key Element in Food Security,” and Steel Maloney (principal hydrologist, Cascade Earth Sciences, “Converting Gray Water to Green Water.” Lead speakers were followed by a panel of experts: Bill Cox (CoxCo Agricultural Consulting), “Practical Solutions to Agriculture's Water Issues”; John Peck (professor of water law, Kansas Univ.), “Land, Law, and Water: Removing Barriers to Water Security”; and Chris Goemans (resource economist, Colorado State Univ.), “Economics: Its Impact on Water Security.” Following the symposia, the Societies’ science communication staff produced several articles based on interviews with the symposium speakers. Articles included “Three Shades of Water: Increasing Water Security with Blue, Green, and Gray Water”; “Reusing Wastewater for Crop Irrigation in Kansas”; and “Subsurface Drip Irrigation.” The articles were published in the CSA News magazine, which is distributed to all ASA, CSSA, and SSSA members, and in the Crops & Soils magazine, which is distributed to 13,000 Certified Crop Advisers (CCAs) in the United States and Canada. Many CCAs are employed by retail or wholesale agribusinesses and work directly with producers. Further outreach to the user community was attained by live-casting the 2013 ASA symposium for CCA continuing education credit. ASA continues to offer soil and water management training through a full-time Agronomy and Soil Science Education Manager. Educational offerings include webinars and self-paced, self-study modules. Definition of water security Global water resources Water resources and food security Blue water demand for sustainable intensification Managing green water in dryland agriculture Environmental impact of water use in agriculture Towards achieving water security in agriculture Legal constraints on conserving water in the western United States Research and development principles The authors have done an excellent job in summarizing the various aspects of our knowledge of water security in agriculture, and we thank them for their efforts. The remaining step is to develop impactful “one-pager” documents to use in communication with the general public.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".