MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2234294374 · doi:10.1515/9781894725217-006

4 Rural Development and the Regional Construct: A Comparative Analysis of the Newfoundland and Labrador and Ireland Contexts

2015· book-chapter· en· W2234294374 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David J. A. Douglas, Brendan O’Keeffe

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typebook-chapter
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueRural development and sustainability
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConstruct (python library)GeographyRegional scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Given their historical and cultural linkages as well as their shared status, until the last 15 years, as underdeveloped islands contiguous to larger industrial regions and societies, Ireland and Newfoundland and Labrador have become a topic of considerable interest among academics and the media, as well as among governments, for comparative purposes in understanding their recent development trajectories.As the authors of this chapter make clear in their analysis of planning and development policies in the two jurisdictions, despite many similarities, there are important historical, political, and economic differences as well.If lessons are to be learned for either jurisdiction, but particularly for Newfoundland and Labrador, understanding and appreciation of the different paths and contexts and their implications for comparative lessons are critical.northwest Connemara and Duhallow in northwest Cork and East Kerry, Kiltimagh, County Mayo), extensive experimentation and innovations in area-based partnerships (e.g., Meldon et al., 2002;Fitzpatrick Associates, 2003;O'Keeffe, 2006), and a variety of other initiatives.However, outside of the rich record of collaborative development and development planning evident in a variety of partnership arrangements (e.g., Sabel, 1996;Cavazzani and Moseley, 1999; Moseley, 2003a; Walsh and Meldon, 2004), a modest volume of analytical work has been completed on a comparative basis.The province of Newfoundland and Labrador in Canada has seen a varied array of rural development initiatives over the last four decades (Fuchs, 1995;Greenwood, 1997;House, 2003).The rural deprivation associated with long periods of relative disadvantage (e.g., in per capita incomes, unemployment rates), high levels of dependency on primary resources (e.g., forestry, mining, fishing), endemic out-migration, and slow economic growth was exacerbated by the cathartic and wholesale collapse of the northern cod fishery in the early 1990s.In the more recent past Newfoundland and Labrador has seen substantial macroeconomic revitalization through alternative fishery activities and offshore oil development (e.g., the Hibernia field).The province looks to further development opportunities through the massive Voisey's Bay nickel mine development, more oil and gas development, continuing diversification of its small manufacturing sector, and new developments in the telecommunications-based services sector.Rural development initiatives over these four decades have been varied, involving a considerable amount of innovation, learning, and cumulative refinement of policy, process, and organizational design.The latest is a significant initiative, in the Canadian context, involving multi-community and multi-interest Regional Economic Development Boards, organized on a territorial or zonal basis, entering into formal performance-based contractual relations with the provincial and the federal government for long-term rural development.This process has now been refined after an initial period of operation and assessment. RESEARCH PURPOSE AND APPROACHThe purpose of this research is to initiate a selective and exploratory comparative analysis of the rural development planning process in Ireland and Newfoundland and Labrador.The comparative analysis will be divided into two overlapping perspectives.The first will address development policy, its content, the underlying values and priorities that inform it, and the espoused rationale.These will be noted and a preliminary interpretation of each will be attempted.Second, the paper will initiate a comparative analysis of the process of development design, using the regional perspective as a case in point, and will examine this design in terms of its intent, rationale, direction, participants, and other characteristics, as well as its implementation as a revealed process of rural development planning.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,669
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,739

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetRural development and sustainabilityTravaux en français237 207