MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2235370872

Overweight and Obesity in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Findings Consistent with Typically Developing Children

2014· article· en· W2235370872 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sabrina N. Grondhuis

Notice bibliographique

RevueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTypically developingAutismOverweightObesityPsychologyMedicineDevelopmental psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Childhood overweight and obesity are considerable problems both in the United States and worldwide.These abnormal weight categories are often accompanied by increased physical and mental health complications including diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular issues, and depression.Most concerning, elevated body mass in childhood generally leads to elevated body mass in adulthood, which is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality.Youth with intellectual or developmental disabilities, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), appear to be at heightened risk for overweight and obesity due to high medication use, atypical eating habits, and sedentary behavior.Previous literature is mixed as to whether these children actually have higher prevalence rates of overweight and obesity, although the methodology associated with some studies has been subpar due to use of parent-derived height and weight, and small sample sizes.This dissertation was designed to investigate the prevalence of abnormal weight in children with ASD, and to identify what variables were associated with elevated body mass.The sample comprised children from the United States and Canada who visited a hospital or clinic that was part of the Autism Treatment Network.In this sample, 32.9% of the children were overweight and 17.3% were obese, which was not significantly different from the rates of elevated body mass in typically developing children or from some previous studies of children with ASD.iii Multiple hierarchical regression models were run to analyze the data from a variety of perspectives, while trying to avoid confounds such as prescribed medication, different Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) age versions, and clinical site.The most successful model was called "Atheoretical Empiricism," and it found that Asian heritage, high levels of paternal education, stimulant use, atomoxetine use, high scores of the Anxious/Depressed CBCL subscale, and having a pervasive developmental disorder -not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) diagnosis were associated with lower BMI percentile.Hispanic heritage, SSRI use, alpha 2 agonist use, high scores on the Sleep Disordered Breathing subscale of the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire, and elevated scores of the CBCL Aggressive Behavior subscale and Withdrawn/Depressed subscale were associated with higher BMI percentile (greater likelihood of being overweight or obese).The variance accounted for declined when the more specific theory-driven investigations were conducted.The model had a better fit for older children whose parents completed the 6-18 year CBCL version rather than younger children whose parents completed the 1.5-5 year version.When evaluated by specific ASD diagnosis, the model fit best for children with PDD-NOS.There were great variations between model fit across sites; data from two Northeastern sites accounted for more variance (13.5% for Site 23 and 17.1% for Site 2) than any of the previous manipulations.Although far less variance was accounted for than initially hoped, variance levels in this study were consistent with amounts from other investigations.This study confirmed that several of the predictors for overweight and obesity in the neurotypical population held true for children with ASD.Future directions for research and weight-related interventions were discussed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,229
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,658

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,003
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,182
Écart entre enseignants0,177 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Même sujetChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesTravaux en français237 207